spi: altera: Use struct-based register access

Zap the offset-based register access and use the struct-based one
as this is the preferred method.

No functional change, but there are some line-over-80 problems in
the driver, which will be addressed later.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>
Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Marek Vasut 2014-10-22 21:55:58 +02:00 committed by Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
parent 0ce4af99c0
commit eef67029d6

View File

@ -12,11 +12,14 @@
#include <malloc.h>
#include <spi.h>
#define ALTERA_SPI_RXDATA 0
#define ALTERA_SPI_TXDATA 4
#define ALTERA_SPI_STATUS 8
#define ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL 12
#define ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL 20
struct altera_spi_regs {
u32 rxdata;
u32 txdata;
u32 status;
u32 control;
u32 _reserved;
u32 slave_sel;
};
#define ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_ROE_MSK (0x8)
#define ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_TOE_MSK (0x10)
@ -39,8 +42,8 @@
static ulong altera_spi_base_list[] = CONFIG_SYS_ALTERA_SPI_LIST;
struct altera_spi_slave {
struct spi_slave slave;
ulong base;
struct spi_slave slave;
struct altera_spi_regs *regs;
};
#define to_altera_spi_slave(s) container_of(s, struct altera_spi_slave, slave)
@ -54,16 +57,16 @@ __attribute__((weak))
void spi_cs_activate(struct spi_slave *slave)
{
struct altera_spi_slave *altspi = to_altera_spi_slave(slave);
writel(1 << slave->cs, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
writel(ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL_SSO_MSK, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL);
writel(1 << slave->cs, &altspi->regs->slave_sel);
writel(ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL_SSO_MSK, &altspi->regs->control);
}
__attribute__((weak))
void spi_cs_deactivate(struct spi_slave *slave)
{
struct altera_spi_slave *altspi = to_altera_spi_slave(slave);
writel(0, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL);
writel(0, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
writel(0, &altspi->regs->control);
writel(0, &altspi->regs->slave_sel);
}
void spi_init(void)
@ -87,9 +90,9 @@ struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
if (!altspi)
return NULL;
altspi->base = altera_spi_base_list[bus];
debug("%s: bus:%i cs:%i base:%lx\n", __func__,
bus, cs, altspi->base);
altspi->regs = (struct altera_spi_regs *)altera_spi_base_list[bus];
debug("%s: bus:%i cs:%i base:%p\n", __func__,
bus, cs, altspi->regs);
return &altspi->slave;
}
@ -105,8 +108,8 @@ int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
struct altera_spi_slave *altspi = to_altera_spi_slave(slave);
debug("%s: bus:%i cs:%i\n", __func__, slave->bus, slave->cs);
writel(0, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_CONTROL);
writel(0, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
writel(0, &altspi->regs->control);
writel(0, &altspi->regs->slave_sel);
return 0;
}
@ -115,7 +118,7 @@ void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
struct altera_spi_slave *altspi = to_altera_spi_slave(slave);
debug("%s: bus:%i cs:%i\n", __func__, slave->bus, slave->cs);
writel(0, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_SLAVE_SEL);
writel(0, &altspi->regs->slave_sel);
}
#ifndef CONFIG_ALTERA_SPI_IDLE_VAL
@ -142,20 +145,18 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, const void *dout,
}
/* empty read buffer */
if (readl(altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_STATUS) &
ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_RRDY_MSK)
readl(altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_RXDATA);
if (readl(&altspi->regs->status) & ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_RRDY_MSK)
readl(&altspi->regs->rxdata);
if (flags & SPI_XFER_BEGIN)
spi_cs_activate(slave);
while (bytes--) {
uchar d = txp ? *txp++ : CONFIG_ALTERA_SPI_IDLE_VAL;
debug("%s: tx:%x ", __func__, d);
writel(d, altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_TXDATA);
while (!(readl(altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_STATUS) &
ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_RRDY_MSK))
writel(d, &altspi->regs->txdata);
while (!(readl(&altspi->regs->status) & ALTERA_SPI_STATUS_RRDY_MSK))
;
d = readl(altspi->base + ALTERA_SPI_RXDATA);
d = readl(&altspi->regs->rxdata);
if (rxp)
*rxp++ = d;
debug("rx:%x\n", d);