common: image-fit: Cleanup spelling mistakes
The comments in the source file are riddled with spelling mistakes. Be a good citizen and take a stab at cleaning up some of the more obvious ones. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg@ti.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
030cada824
commit
e17adbb350
@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int fit_get_subimage_count(const void *fit, int images_noffset)
|
||||
* @p: pointer to prefix string
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_print_contents() formats a multi line FIT image contents description.
|
||||
* The routine prints out FIT image properties (root node level) follwed by
|
||||
* The routine prints out FIT image properties (root node level) followed by
|
||||
* the details of each component image.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns:
|
||||
@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void fit_print_contents(const void *fit)
|
||||
* @p: pointer to prefix string
|
||||
* @type: Type of information to print ("hash" or "sign")
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_image_print_data() lists properies for the processed hash node
|
||||
* fit_image_print_data() lists properties for the processed hash node
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This function avoid using puts() since it prints a newline on the host
|
||||
* but does not in U-Boot.
|
||||
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static void fit_image_print_data(const void *fit, int noffset, const char *p,
|
||||
* @noffset: offset of the hash or signature node
|
||||
* @p: pointer to prefix string
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This lists properies for the processed hash node
|
||||
* This lists properties for the processed hash node
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns:
|
||||
* no returned results
|
||||
@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static void fit_image_print_verification_data(const void *fit, int noffset,
|
||||
* @image_noffset: offset of the component image node
|
||||
* @p: pointer to prefix string
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_image_print() lists all mandatory properies for the processed component
|
||||
* fit_image_print() lists all mandatory properties for the processed component
|
||||
* image. If present, hash nodes are printed out as well. Load
|
||||
* address for images of type firmware is also printed out. Since the load
|
||||
* address is not mandatory for firmware images, it will be output as
|
||||
@ -459,10 +459,10 @@ void fit_image_print(const void *fit, int image_noffset, const char *p)
|
||||
* fit_get_desc - get node description property
|
||||
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
|
||||
* @noffset: node offset
|
||||
* @desc: double pointer to the char, will hold pointer to the descrption
|
||||
* @desc: double pointer to the char, will hold pointer to the description
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_get_desc() reads description property from a given node, if
|
||||
* description is found pointer to it is returened in third call argument.
|
||||
* description is found pointer to it is returned in third call argument.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns:
|
||||
* 0, on success
|
||||
@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ int fit_get_desc(const void *fit, int noffset, char **desc)
|
||||
* @noffset: node offset
|
||||
* @timestamp: pointer to the time_t, will hold read timestamp
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_get_timestamp() reads timestamp poperty from given node, if timestamp
|
||||
* is found and has a correct size its value is retured in third call
|
||||
* fit_get_timestamp() reads timestamp property from given node, if timestamp
|
||||
* is found and has a correct size its value is returned in third call
|
||||
* argument.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns:
|
||||
@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ int fit_get_timestamp(const void *fit, int noffset, time_t *timestamp)
|
||||
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
|
||||
* @image_uname: component image node unit name
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_image_get_node() finds a component image (withing the '/images'
|
||||
* fit_image_get_node() finds a component image (within the '/images'
|
||||
* node) of a provided unit name. If image is found its node offset is
|
||||
* returned to the caller.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static int fit_image_check_hash(const void *fit, int noffset, const void *data,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* fit_image_verify - verify data intergity
|
||||
* fit_image_verify - verify data integrity
|
||||
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
|
||||
* @image_noffset: component image node offset
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ error:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* fit_all_image_verify - verify data intergity for all images
|
||||
* fit_all_image_verify - verify data integrity for all images
|
||||
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_all_image_verify() goes over all images in the FIT and
|
||||
@ -1380,8 +1380,8 @@ int fit_conf_find_compat(const void *fit, const void *fdt)
|
||||
* @fit: pointer to the FIT format image header
|
||||
* @conf_uname: configuration node unit name
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_conf_get_node() finds a configuration (withing the '/configurations'
|
||||
* parant node) of a provided unit name. If configuration is found its node
|
||||
* fit_conf_get_node() finds a configuration (within the '/configurations'
|
||||
* parent node) of a provided unit name. If configuration is found its node
|
||||
* offset is returned to the caller.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When NULL is provided in second argument fit_conf_get_node() will search
|
||||
@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ int fit_conf_get_prop_node(const void *fit, int noffset,
|
||||
* @noffset: offset of the configuration node
|
||||
* @p: pointer to prefix string
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fit_conf_print() lists all mandatory properies for the processed
|
||||
* fit_conf_print() lists all mandatory properties for the processed
|
||||
* configuration node.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* returns:
|
||||
@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static const char *fit_get_image_type_property(int type)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is sort-of available in the uimage_type[] table in image.c
|
||||
* but we don't have access to the sohrt name, and "fdt" is different
|
||||
* but we don't have access to the short name, and "fdt" is different
|
||||
* anyway. So let's just keep it here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
switch (type) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user