ARM: uniphier: remove part number info from the boot log
As is often the case with SoC development, slightly different products (i.e. different part number) are developed based on the same silicon-die. Such fine grained information is unmaintainable. Also, "SoC:" is a better fit that "CPU:". Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
673ac334fc
commit
b8faf5f12b
@ -20,37 +20,37 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
|
||||
model = uniphier_get_soc_model();
|
||||
rev = uniphier_get_soc_revision();
|
||||
|
||||
puts("CPU: ");
|
||||
puts("SoC: ");
|
||||
|
||||
switch (id) {
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_SLD3_ID:
|
||||
puts("sLD3 (MN2WS0220)");
|
||||
puts("sLD3");
|
||||
required_model = 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_LD4_ID:
|
||||
puts("LD4 (MN2WS0250)");
|
||||
puts("LD4");
|
||||
required_rev = 2;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_PRO4_ID:
|
||||
puts("Pro4 (MN2WS0230)");
|
||||
puts("Pro4");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_SLD8_ID:
|
||||
puts("sLD8 (MN2WS0270)");
|
||||
puts("sLD8");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_PRO5_ID:
|
||||
puts("Pro5 (MN2WS0300)");
|
||||
puts("Pro5");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_PXS2_ID:
|
||||
puts("PXs2 (MN2WS0310)");
|
||||
puts("PXs2");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_LD6B_ID:
|
||||
puts("LD6b (MN2WS0320)");
|
||||
puts("LD6b");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_LD11_ID:
|
||||
puts("LD11 (SC1405AP1)");
|
||||
puts("LD11");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_LD20_ID:
|
||||
puts("LD20 (SC1401AJ1)");
|
||||
puts("LD20");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case UNIPHIER_PXS3_ID:
|
||||
puts("PXs3");
|
||||
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
|
||||
return -ENOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
printf(" model %d (revision %d)\n", model, rev);
|
||||
printf(" (model %d, revision %d)\n", model, rev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (model < required_model) {
|
||||
printf("Only model %d or newer is supported.\n",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user