The rpc reply has multiple levels of error returns. The code here contributes
to the confusion by using "accept_statp" for a pointer to what the rfc (and
wireshark, etc.) refer to as the "reply_stat". (The confusion is compounded
by the fact that the rfc also has an "accept_stat" which follows the
reply_stat in the succesful case.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>