Recursive dependency issues with kconfig are unavoidable due to some limitations with kconfig, since these issues are recurring provide a hint to the user how they can resolve these dependency issues and also document why such limitation exists. While at it also document a bit of future prospects of ways to enhance Kconfig, including providing formal semantics and evaluation of use of a SAT solver. If you're interested in this work or prospects of it check out the kconfig-sat project wiki [0] and mailing list [1]. [0] http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelProjects/kconfig-sat [1] https://groups.google.com/d/forum/kconfig-sat Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@odin.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Mate Soos <soos.mate@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			64 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			64 lines
		
	
	
		
			2.8 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Cumulative Kconfig recursive issue
 | |
| # ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| #
 | |
| # Test with:
 | |
| #
 | |
| # make KBUILD_KCONFIG=Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02 allnoconfig
 | |
| #
 | |
| # The recursive limitations with Kconfig has some non intuitive implications on
 | |
| # kconfig sematics which are documented here. One known practical implication
 | |
| # of the recursive limitation is that drivers cannot negate features from other
 | |
| # drivers if they share a common core requirement and use disjoint semantics to
 | |
| # annotate those requirements, ie, some drivers use "depends on" while others
 | |
| # use "select". For instance it means if a driver A and driver B share the same
 | |
| # core requirement, and one uses "select" while the other uses "depends on" to
 | |
| # annotate this, all features that driver A selects cannot now be negated by
 | |
| # driver B.
 | |
| #
 | |
| # A perhaps not so obvious implication of this is that, if semantics on these
 | |
| # core requirements are not carefully synced, as drivers evolve features
 | |
| # they select or depend on end up becoming shared requirements which cannot be
 | |
| # negated by other drivers.
 | |
| #
 | |
| # The example provided in Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-02
 | |
| # describes a simple driver core layout of example features a kernel might
 | |
| # have. Let's assume we have some CORE functionality, then the kernel has a
 | |
| # series of bells and whistles it desires to implement, its not so advanced so
 | |
| # it only supports bells at this time: CORE_BELL_A and CORE_BELL_B. If
 | |
| # CORE_BELL_A has some advanced feature CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED which selects
 | |
| # CORE_BELL_A then CORE_BELL_A ends up becoming a common BELL feature which
 | |
| # other bells in the system cannot negate. The reason for this issue is
 | |
| # due to the disjoint use of semantics on expressing each bell's relationship
 | |
| # with CORE, one uses "depends on" while the other uses "select". Another
 | |
| # more important reason is that kconfig does not check for dependencies listed
 | |
| # under 'select' for a symbol, when such symbols are selected kconfig them
 | |
| # as mandatory required symbols. For more details on the heavy handed nature
 | |
| # of select refer to Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break
 | |
| #
 | |
| # To fix this the "depends on CORE" must be changed to "select CORE", or the
 | |
| # "select CORE" must be changed to "depends on CORE".
 | |
| #
 | |
| # For an example real world scenario issue refer to the attempt to remove
 | |
| # "select FW_LOADER" [0], in the end the simple alternative solution to this
 | |
| # problem consisted on matching semantics with newly introduced features.
 | |
| #
 | |
| # [0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432241149-8762-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com
 | |
| 
 | |
| mainmenu "Simple example to demo cumulative kconfig recursive dependency implication"
 | |
| 
 | |
| config CORE
 | |
| 	tristate
 | |
| 
 | |
| config CORE_BELL_A
 | |
| 	tristate
 | |
| 	depends on CORE
 | |
| 
 | |
| config CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED
 | |
| 	tristate
 | |
| 	select CORE_BELL_A
 | |
| 
 | |
| config CORE_BELL_B
 | |
| 	tristate
 | |
| 	depends on !CORE_BELL_A
 | |
| 	select CORE
 |