forked from Minki/linux
3368bd8097
We expect to have firmware-first handling of RAS SErrors, with errors notified via an APEI method. For systems without firmware-first, add some minimal handling to KVM. There are two ways KVM can take an SError due to a guest, either may be a RAS error: we exit the guest due to an SError routed to EL2 by HCR_EL2.AMO, or we take an SError from EL2 when we unmask PSTATE.A from __guest_exit. For SError that interrupt a guest and are routed to EL2 the existing behaviour is to inject an impdef SError into the guest. Add code to handle RAS SError based on the ESR. For uncontained and uncategorized errors arm64_is_fatal_ras_serror() will panic(), these errors compromise the host too. All other error types are contained: For the fatal errors the vCPU can't make progress, so we inject a virtual SError. We ignore contained errors where we can make progress as if we're lucky, we may not hit them again. If only some of the CPUs support RAS the guest will see the cpufeature sanitised version of the id registers, but we may still take RAS SError on this CPU. Move the SError handling out of handle_exit() into a new handler that runs before we can be preempted. This allows us to use this_cpu_has_cap(), via arm64_is_ras_serror(). Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| kvm | ||
| lib | ||
| Makefile | ||