A recent fix to the cbm_ensure_valid() function left some coding style issues that are now addressed: - Return a value instead of using a function parameter as input and output - Use if (!val) instead of if (val == 0) - Follow reverse fir tree ordering of variable declarations Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/15ba03856f1d944468ee6f44e3fd7aa548293ede.1561408280.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
core.c | ||
ctrlmondata.c | ||
internal.h | ||
Makefile | ||
monitor.c | ||
pseudo_lock_event.h | ||
pseudo_lock.c | ||
rdtgroup.c |