1f727d9e72
I was being overly paranoid in not updating the execobject.offset after
performing the fallback copy where we set reloc.presumed_offset to -1.
The thinking was to ensure that a subsequent NORELOC execbuf would be
forced to process the invalid relocations. However this is overkill so
long as we *only* update the execobject.offset following a successful
update of the relocation value witin the batch. If we have to repeat the
execbuf due to a later interruption, then we may skip the relocations on
the second pass (honouring NORELOC) since the execobject.offset match
the actual offsets (even though reloc.presumed_offset is garbage).
Subsequent calls to execbuf with NORELOC should themselves ensure that
the reloc.presumed_offset have been corrected in case of future
migration.
Reporting back the actual execobject.offset, even when
reloc.presumed_offset is garbage, ensures that reuse of those objects
use the latest information to avoid relocations.
Fixes:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| drm | ||
| host1x | ||
| ipu-v3 | ||
| vga | ||
| Makefile | ||