forked from Minki/linux
fb0527bd5e
Since we want a task waiting for a mutex_lock() to go to sleep and reschedule on need_resched() we must be able to abort the mcs_spin_lock() around the adaptive spin. Therefore implement a cancelable mcs lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: riel@redhat.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: davidlohr@hp.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: andi@firstfloor.org Cc: aswin@hp.com Cc: scott.norton@hp.com Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-62hcl5wxydmjzd182zhvk89m@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
179 lines
4.1 KiB
C
179 lines
4.1 KiB
C
|
|
#include <linux/percpu.h>
|
|
#include <linux/mutex.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include "mcs_spinlock.h"
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
|
|
* lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
|
|
*
|
|
* Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
|
|
* called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
|
|
* spinning.
|
|
*/
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
|
|
* Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue *
|
|
osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *node,
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev)
|
|
{
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
|
|
* will now observe @lock and will complete its
|
|
* unlock()/unqueue().
|
|
*/
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
|
|
* leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
|
|
* @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
|
|
* still valid.
|
|
*
|
|
* If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
|
|
* wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
|
|
* wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (node->next) {
|
|
next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
|
|
if (next)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return next;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
|
|
{
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next;
|
|
|
|
node->locked = 0;
|
|
node->next = NULL;
|
|
|
|
node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node);
|
|
if (likely(prev == NULL))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
|
|
* moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
|
|
*
|
|
* However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
|
|
* guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
|
|
* cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
while (!smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* If we need to reschedule bail... so we can block.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (need_resched())
|
|
goto unqueue;
|
|
|
|
arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
unqueue:
|
|
/*
|
|
* Step - A -- stabilize @prev
|
|
*
|
|
* Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
|
|
* unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
|
|
* (or later).
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
if (prev->next == node &&
|
|
cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
|
|
* in which case we should observe @node->locked becomming
|
|
* true.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
|
|
* case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
|
|
*/
|
|
prev = ACCESS_ONCE(node->prev);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Step - B -- stabilize @next
|
|
*
|
|
* Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
|
|
* back to @prev.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev);
|
|
if (!next)
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Step - C -- unlink
|
|
*
|
|
* @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
|
|
* pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
|
|
* it will wait in Step-A.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
ACCESS_ONCE(next->prev) = prev;
|
|
ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = next;
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
|
|
{
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
|
|
struct optimistic_spin_queue *next;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Fast path for the uncontended case.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node))
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Second most likely case.
|
|
*/
|
|
next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
|
|
if (next) {
|
|
ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, NULL);
|
|
if (next)
|
|
ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|