196779b9b4
Both dump_stack() and show_stack() are currently implemented by each architecture. show_stack(NULL, NULL) dumps the backtrace for the current task as does dump_stack(). On some archs, dump_stack() prints extra information - pid, utsname and so on - in addition to the backtrace while the two are identical on other archs. The usages in arch-independent code of the two functions indicate show_stack(NULL, NULL) should print out bare backtrace while dump_stack() is used for debugging purposes when something went wrong, so it does make sense to print additional information on the task which triggered dump_stack(). There's no reason to require archs to implement two separate but mostly identical functions. It leads to unnecessary subtle information. This patch expands the dummy fallback dump_stack() implementation in lib/dump_stack.c such that it prints out debug information (taken from x86) and invokes show_stack(NULL, NULL) and drops arch-specific dump_stack() implementations in all archs except blackfin. Blackfin's dump_stack() does something wonky that I don't understand. Debug information can be printed separately by calling dump_stack_print_info() so that arch-specific dump_stack() implementation can still emit the same debug information. This is used in blackfin. This patch brings the following behavior changes. * On some archs, an extra level in backtrace for show_stack() could be printed. This is because the top frame was determined in dump_stack() on those archs while generic dump_stack() can't do that reliably. It can be compensated by inlining dump_stack() but not sure whether that'd be necessary. * Most archs didn't use to print debug info on dump_stack(). They do now. An example WARN dump follows. WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:4841 init_workqueues+0x35/0x505() Hardware name: empty Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc1-work+ #9 0000000000000009 ffff88007c861e08 ffffffff81c614dc ffff88007c861e48 ffffffff8108f50f ffffffff82228240 0000000000000040 ffffffff8234a03c 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88007c861e58 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81c614dc>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b [<ffffffff8108f50f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [<ffffffff8108f56a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [<ffffffff8234a071>] init_workqueues+0x35/0x505 ... v2: CPU number added to the generic debug info as requested by s390 folks and dropped the s390 specific dump_stack(). This loses %ksp from the debug message which the maintainers think isn't important enough to keep the s390-specific dump_stack() implementation. dump_stack_print_info() is moved to kernel/printk.c from lib/dump_stack.c. Because linkage is per objecct file, dump_stack_print_info() living in the same lib file as generic dump_stack() means that archs which implement custom dump_stack() - at this point, only blackfin - can't use dump_stack_print_info() as that will bring in the generic version of dump_stack() too. v1 The v1 patch broke build on blackfin due to this issue. The build breakage was reported by Fengguang Wu. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> [s390 bits] Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Acked-by: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> [hexagon bits] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| boot | ||
| include | ||
| kernel | ||
| lib | ||
| mm | ||
| platform | ||
| defconfig | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Kconfig.cpu | ||
| Kconfig.debug | ||
| Kconfig.ide | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README | ||
linux-2.6 for H8/300 README
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
* Supported CPU
H8/300H and H8S
* Supported Target
1.simulator of GDB
require patches.
2.AE 3068/AE 3069
more information
MICROTRONIQUE <http://www.microtronique.com/>
Akizuki Denshi Tsusho Ltd. <http://akizukidenshi.com/> (Japanese Only)
3.H8MAX
see http://ip-sol.jp/h8max/ (Japanese Only)
4.EDOSK2674
see http://www.eu.renesas.com/products/mpumcu/tool/edk/support/edosk2674.html
http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/ports/h8/HITACHI-EDOSK2674-HOWTO
http://www.azpower.com/H8-uClinux/
* Toolchain Version
gcc-3.1 or higher and patch
see arch/h8300/tools_patch/README
binutils-2.12 or higher
gdb-5.2 or higher
The environment that can compile a h8300-elf binary is necessary.
* Userland Develop environment
used h8300-elf toolchains.
see http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/ports/h8/
* A few words of thanks
Porting to H8/300 serieses is support of Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan.
I thank support.
and All developer/user.