Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Matlack
4ee602e78d KVM: selftests: Replace x86_page_size with PG_LEVEL_XX
x86_page_size is an enum used to communicate the desired page size with
which to map a range of memory. Under the hood they just encode the
desired level at which to map the page. This ends up being clunky in a
few ways:

 - The name suggests it encodes the size of the page rather than the
   level.
 - In other places in x86_64/processor.c we just use a raw int to encode
   the level.

Simplify this by adopting the kernel style of PG_LEVEL_XX enums and pass
around raw ints when referring to the level. This makes the code easier
to understand since these macros are very common in KVM MMU code.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220520233249.3776001-2-dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2022-06-09 10:52:22 -04:00
Marc Zyngier
f8f0edabcc KVM: selftests: x86: Address missing vm_install_exception_handler conversions
Commit b78f4a5966 ("KVM: selftests: Rename vm_handle_exception")
raced with a couple of new x86 tests, missing two vm_handle_exception
to vm_install_exception_handler conversions.

Help the two broken tests to catch up with the new world.

Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
CC: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20210701071928.2971053-1-maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-07-14 12:15:05 -04:00
Sean Christopherson
ef6a74b2e5 KVM: sefltests: Add x86-64 test to verify MMU reacts to CPUID updates
Add an x86-only test to verify that x86's MMU reacts to CPUID updates
that impact the MMU.  KVM has had multiple bugs where it fails to
reconfigure the MMU after the guest's vCPU model changes.

Sadly, this test is effectively limited to shadow paging because the
hardware page walk handler doesn't support software disabling of GBPAGES
support, and KVM doesn't manually walk the GVA->GPA on faults for
performance reasons (doing so would large defeat the benefits of TDP).

Don't require !TDP for the tests as there is still value in running the
tests with TDP, even though the tests will fail (barring KVM hacks).
E.g. KVM should not completely explode if MAXPHYADDR results in KVM using
4-level vs. 5-level paging for the guest.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20210622200529.3650424-20-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2021-06-24 11:47:56 -04:00