Required backmerge since we will be based on top of v5.11, and there
has been a request to backmerge already to upstream some features.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Pull drm updates from Dave Airlie:
"Not a huge amount of big things here, AMD has support for a few new HW
variants (vangogh, green sardine, dimgrey cavefish), Intel has some
more DG1 enablement. We have a few big reworks of the TTM layers and
interfaces, GEM and atomic internal API reworks cross tree. fbdev is
marked orphaned in here as well to reflect the current reality.
core:
- documentation updates
- deprecate DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE
- atomic crtc enable/disable rework
- GEM convert drivers to gem object functions
- remove SCATTER_LIST_MAX_SEGMENT
sched:
- avoid infinite waits
ttm:
- remove AGP support
- don't modify caching for swapout
- ttm pinning rework
- major TTM reworks
- new backend allocator
- multihop support
vram-helper:
- top down BO placement fix
- TTM changes
- GEM object support
displayport:
- DP 2.0 DPCD prep work
- DP MST extended DPCD caps
fbdev:
- mark as orphaned
amdgpu:
- Initial Vangogh support
- Green Sardine support
- Dimgrey Cavefish support
- SG display support for renoir
- SMU7 improvements
- gfx9+ modiifier support
- CI BACO fixes
radeon:
- expose voltage via hwmon on SUMO
amdkfd:
- fix unique id handling
i915:
- more DG1 enablement
- bigjoiner support
- integer scaling filter support
- async flip support
- ICL+ DSI command mode
- Improve display shutdown
- Display refactoring
- eLLC machine fbdev loading fix
- dma scatterlist fixes
- TGL hang fixes
- eLLC display buffer caching on SKL+
- MOCS PTE seeting for gen9+
msm:
- Shutdown hook
- GPU cooling device support
- DSI 7nm and 10nm phy/pll updates
- sm8150/sm2850 DPU support
- GEM locking re-work
- LLCC system cache support
aspeed:
- sysfs output config support
ast:
- LUT fix
- new display mode
gma500:
- remove 2d framebuffer accel
panfrost:
- move gpu reset to a worker
exynos:
- new HDMI mode support
mediatek:
- MT8167 support
- yaml bindings
- MIPI DSI phy code moved
etnaviv:
- new perf counter
- more lockdep annotation
hibmc:
- i2c DDC support
ingenic:
- pixel clock reset fix
- reserved memory support
- allow both DMA channels at once
- different pixel format support
- 30/24/8-bit palette modes
tilcdc:
- don't keep vblank irq enabled
vc4:
- new maintainer added
- DSI registration fix
virtio:
- blob resource support
- host visible and cross-device support
- uuid api support"
* tag 'drm-next-2020-12-11' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm: (1754 commits)
drm/amdgpu: Initialise drm_gem_object_funcs for imported BOs
drm/amdgpu: fix size calculation with stolen vga memory
drm/amdgpu: remove amdgpu_ttm_late_init and amdgpu_bo_late_init
drm/amdgpu: free the pre-OS console framebuffer after the first modeset
drm/amdgpu: enable runtime pm using BACO on CI dGPUs
drm/amdgpu/cik: enable BACO reset on Bonaire
drm/amd/pm: update smu10.h WORKLOAD_PPLIB setting for raven
drm/amd/pm: remove one unsupported smu function for vangogh
drm/amd/display: setup system context for APUs
drm/amd/display: add S/G support for Vangogh
drm/amdkfd: Fix leak in dmabuf import
drm/amdgpu: use AMDGPU_NUM_VMID when possible
drm/amdgpu: fix sdma instance fw version and feature version init
drm/amd/pm: update driver if version for dimgrey_cavefish
drm/amd/display: 3.2.115
drm/amd/display: [FW Promotion] Release 0.0.45
drm/amd/display: Revert DCN2.1 dram_clock_change_latency update
drm/amd/display: Enable gpu_vm_support for dcn3.01
drm/amd/display: Fixed the audio noise during mode switching with HDCP mode on
drm/amd/display: Add wm table for Renoir
...
This add support for the Khadas TS050 1080x1920 5" LCD DSI panel designed to work
with the Khadas Edge-V, Captain, VIM3 and VIM3L Single Board Computers.
It provides a MIPI DSI interface to the host, a built-in LED backlight
and touch controller.
The init values was taken from the vendor source tree, comments were added to the
know values but most of the init table is undocumented.
Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
[narmstrong: call drm_panel_remove if mipi_dsi_attach fails]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204081949.38418-3-narmstrong@baylibre.com
The DSI version of the panel behaved instable and close
scrutiny of the vendor driver from the Samsung
GT-S8190 shows a different initialization sequence for
the DSI mode panel than the DPI mode panel.
Make the initialization depend on whether we are in
DSI or DPI mode and handle the differences.
After this the panel on the GT-I8190 becomes much more
stable.
Also spell out some more custom DCS commands found in
the vendor source code to cut down a bit on magic
where we can.
Fixes: f0aee45ffc ("drm/panel: s6e63m0: Fix init sequence")
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201205122229.1952980-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Add support for the BOE NV110WTM-N61 panel. The EDID lists two modes
(one for 60 Hz refresh rate and one for 40 Hz), so we'll list both of
them here.
Note that the panel datasheet requires 80 ms between HPD asserting and
the backlight power being turned on. We'll use the new timing
constraints structure to do this cleanly. This assumes that the
backlight will be enabled _after_ the panel enable finishes. This is
how it works today and seems a sane assumption.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.4.I71b2118dfc00fd7b43b02d28e7b890081c2acfa2@changeid
On the panel I'm looking at, there's an 80 ms minimum time between HPD
being asserted by the panel and setting the backlight enable GPIO.
While we could just add an 80 ms "enable" delay, this is not ideal.
Link training is allowed to happen in parallel with this delay so the
fixed 80 ms delay over-delays.
We'll support this by logging the time at the end of prepare and then
delaying in enable if enough time hasn't passed.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.3.Ib9ce3c6482f464bf594161581521ced46bbd54ed@changeid
It is believed that all of the current users of the "unprepare" delay
don't actually need to wait the amount of time specified directly in
the unprepare phase. The purpose of the delay that's specified is to
allow the panel to fully power off so that we don't try to power it
back on before it's managed to full power down.
Let's use this observation to avoid the fixed delay that we currently
have. Instead of delaying, we'll note the current time when the
unprepare happens. If someone then tries to prepare the panel later
and not enough time has passed, we'll do the delay before starting the
prepare phase.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109170018.v4.2.I06a95d83e7fa1bd919c8edd63dacacb5436e495a@changeid
The probe routine acquires the reset GPIO using GPIOD_OUT_LOW. Directly
afterwards it calls acx565akm_detect(), which sets the GPIO value to
HIGH. If the bootloader initialized the GPIO to HIGH before the probe
routine was called, there is only a very short time period of a few
instructions where the reset signal is LOW. Exact time depends on
compiler optimizations, kernel configuration and alignment of the stars,
but I expect it to be always way less than 10us. There are no public
datasheets for the panel, but acx565akm_power_on() has a comment with
timings and reset period should be at least 10us. So this potentially
brings the panel into a half-reset state.
The result is, that panel may not work after boot and can get into a
working state by re-enabling it (e.g. by blanking + unblanking), since
that does a clean reset cycle. This bug has recently been hit by Ivaylo
Dimitrov, but there are some older reports which are probably the same
bug. At least Tony Lindgren, Peter Ujfalusi and Jarkko Nikula have
experienced it in 2017 describing the blank/unblank procedure as
possible workaround.
Note, that the bug really goes back in time. It has originally been
introduced in the predecessor of the omapfb driver in commit 3c45d05be3
("OMAPDSS: acx565akm panel: handle gpios in panel driver") in 2012.
That driver eventually got replaced by a newer one, which had the bug
from the beginning in commit 84192742d9 ("OMAPDSS: Add Sony ACX565AKM
panel driver") and still exists in fbdev world. That driver has later
been copied to omapdrm and then was used as a basis for this driver.
Last but not least the omapdrm specific driver has been removed in
commit 45f16c82db ("drm/omap: displays: Remove unused panel drivers").
Reported-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Reported-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reported-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Reported-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Cc: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Fixes: 1c8fc3f0c5 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Sony ACX565AKM panel")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201127200429.129868-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com
The init sequence consist of a number of unknown settings
for the display controller. This patch achieves two things:
- Fix an error that must have happened when the driver was
converted from the backlight subsystem: the 0xb8
configuration command was lost and added as a tail to
the previous command.
- Update some minor settings in some bytes here and there
according to changes in the Samsung GT-I9070 and
Samsung GT-S7710 code dumps. Since two other devices use
these settings they probably reflect trimmings later
found to be better for the display rather than
customizations for these devices.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201117175621.870085-3-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Copy over the width/height in millimeters to the
(somewhat redundant) display info, and set up the
bus format and bus flags for the display.
When used as DPI this display requires DE to be
active low and pixel data to be output on the
negative edge. It might be that it was previously
used with a display controller that either does
not support these settings or was hardcoded to use
these as default. This information comes from the
source code of the Samsung GT-I9070 mobile phone.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201110234653.2248594-6-linus.walleij@linaro.org
The OnePlus 6/T devices use different panels however they are
functionally identical with the only differences being the resolution.
The panels also don't seem to be used by any other devices, just combine
them into one driver.
The panels are: samsung,sofef00
and samsung,s6e3fc2x01
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
[fixed checkpatch warnings]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201112161920.2671430-2-caleb@connolly.tech
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_SRGB_THROUGH' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_SRGB_ALIGNED' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_SRGB_DUMMY_320X240' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_SRGB_DUMMY_360X240' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_DISABLED_1' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_PRGB_THROUGH' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_PRGB_ALIGNED' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_YUV_640X320_YCBCR' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_YUV_720X360_YCBCR' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_DISABLED_2' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_ITU_R_BT656_720X360_YCBCR' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_ITU_R_BT656_640X320_YCBCR' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-ilitek-ili9322.c:177: warning: Enum value 'ILI9322_INPUT_UNKNOWN' not described in enum 'ili9322_input'
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201105144517.1826692-17-lee.jones@linaro.org
