The init() hook is called by the subdev's oneinit(). Rename it
accordingly to avoid confusion about the lifetime of objects allocated
in it.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Since GR has moved to using the falcon library to start the falcons,
this function is not needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Use the falcon library functions in secure boot. This removes a lot of
code and makes the secure boot flow easier to understand as no register
is directly accessed.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These functions should use the nvkm_secboot_falcon enum. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a dummy PMU device so the PMU falcon is instanciated and can be used
by secure boot.
We could reuse gk20a's implementation here, but it would fight with
secboot over PMU falcon's ownership and secboot will reset the PMU,
preventing it from operating afterwards. Proper handout between secboot
and pmu is coming along with the actual gm20b PMU implementation, so
use this as a temporary solution.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Some functions always succeed - change their return type to void and
remove the error-handling code in their caller.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Use the PMU constructor so that all base members (in particular the
falcon instance) are initialized properly.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Have an instance of nvkm_falcon in the PMU structure, ready to be used
by other subdevs (i.e. secboot).
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a PMU constructor so implementations that extend the nvkm_pmu
structure can have all base members properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add a function that allows us to query whether a given subdev is
currently enabled or not.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
I suspect the version bump is just to signify that the table now specifies
pad macro/links instead of SOR/sublinks.
For our usage of the table, just recognising the new version is enough.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This sequence is incorrect for GP102/GP104 boards. This is now being
handled correctly by the PMU subdev during preinit();
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gm20b's FB has the same capabilities as gm200, minus the ability to
allocate RAM. Create a device that reflects this instead of re-using the
gk20a device which may be incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gk20a's FB is not special compared to other Kepler chips, besides the
fact it does not have VRAM. Use the regular gf100 hooks instead of the
incomplete versions we rewrote.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-By: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The gf100 constructor should be called, otherwise we will allocate a
smaller object than expected. This was without effect so far because
gk20a did not allocate a page, but with gf100's page allocation moved
to the oneinit() hook this problem has become apparent.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The reset hook of pmu_func is never called, and gt215 was the only chip
to implement. Remove this dead code.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:56:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:99:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:271:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_link_train_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....
In fact, both functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_sddr3_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr2.c:60:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_sddr2_calc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
....
In fact, these functions are declared in
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/firmware.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ram.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/volt/priv.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/nv50.h
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.h.
So this patch adds missing header dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This fixes (works around?) link training failures seen on (at least)
the Lenovo P50's internal panel.
It's also an important fix on the same system for MST support on the
dock. Sometimes, right after receiving an IRQ from the sink, there's
an error bit (SINKSTAT_ERR) set in the DPAUX registers before we've
even attempted a transaction.
v2. Fixed regression on passive DP->DVI adapters.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The 100c08 scratch page is mapped using dma_map_page() before the TTM
layer has had a chance to set the DMA mask. This means we are still
running with the default of 32 when this code executes, and this causes
problems for platforms with no memory below 4 GB (such as AMD Seattle)
So move the dma_map_page() to the .oneinit hook, which executes after the
DMA mask has been set.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The 100c10 scratch page is mapped using dma_map_page() before the TTM
layer has had a chance to set the DMA mask. This means we are still
running with the default of 32 when this code executes, and this causes
problems for platforms with no memory below 4 GB (such as AMD Seattle)
So move the dma_map_page() to the .oneinit hook, which executes after the
DMA mask has been set.
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Doing direct 64 bit divisions in kernel code leads to references to
undefined symbols on 32 bit architectures. Replace such divisions with
calls to div64_s64 to make the module usable on 32 bit archs.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This enables memory reclocking on Maxwell. Sadly without a PMU firmware it
is useless for gm20x gpus.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
I'm quite sure that those coefficients are real close, because while
testing the biggest error compared to nvidia was around -1.5% (biggest
error with right coefficients is 12.5mV / 600mV = 2%).
These coefficients were REed by modifing the voltage map entries and by
calculating the set voltage back until I was able to forecast which voltage
nvidia sets for a given voltage map entry.
With these formulars I am able to precisely predict at which exact
temperature Nvidia down- or upvolts due to a changed therm reading.
That's why I am quite sure these are right, or at least really really
close.
v4: Use better coefficients and speedo.
v5: Add error message when speedo is missing.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
