While we do handle the additional cursor sizes introduced in NVE4, it looks
like we accidentally broke this when converting over to use Nvidia's
display headers. Since we now use NVVAL in dispnv50/head907d.c in order to
format the value for the cursor layout and NVD9 only had one byte reserved
vs. the 2 bytes reserved in later generations, we end up accidentally
stripping the second bit in the cursor layout format parameter - causing us
to set the wrong cursor size.
This fixes that by adding our own curs_set hook for 917d which uses the
NV917D headers.
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@redhat.com>
Cc: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: ed0b86a90b ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: use NVIDIA's headers for core head_curs_set()")
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
UEFI/RM no longer use IED scripts from the VBIOS, though they appear to
have been updated for use by the x86 VBIOS code, so we should be able to
continue using them for the moment.
Unfortunately, we require some hacks to do so, as the BeforeLinkTraining
IED script became a pointer to an array of scripts instead, without a
revbump of the relevant tables.
There's also some changes to SOR clock divider fiddling, which are
hopefully correct enough that things work as they should.
AFAIK, GA100 shouldn't have display, so it hasn't been added.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Fortunately, all the interrupts we need to bring up basic display support
are contained in a single leaf register, allowing this basic (but hackish)
implementation.
There's a bunch more invasive patches to come implementing all this in a
better/more complete way, but trying to get a minimal series out first.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
VPLL regs changed a bit. There's more stuff to do around these, but it's
less invasive to stick those changes into disp for now.
None of that belongs here anymore anyhow - fix that someday.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GA100 hidden behind a module option, as it's not been as well verified
since initial bring-up and may need additional changes.
There's no display anyway, so this can wait for a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this
(maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc
appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver
init, at least on my ThinkPad P72:
nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b
This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier offset
programmed before you can call NV507D_GET_CAPABILITIES." So, let's fix
this by doing that, and also perform an update afterwards to prevent
racing with the GPU when reading capabilities.
v2:
* Don't just program the DMA notifier offset, make sure to actually
perform an update
v3:
* Don't call UPDATE()
* Actually read the correct notifier fields, as apparently the
CAPABILITIES_DONE field lives in a different location than the main
NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1 field. As well, 907d+ use a different
CAPABILITIES_DONE field then pre-907d cards.
v4:
* Don't forget to check the return value of core507d_read_caps()
v5:
* Get rid of NV50_DISP_CAPS_NTFY[14], use NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY
* Disable notifier after calling GetCapabilities()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 4a2cb4181b ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
We had a, what was supposed to be temporary, hack in the KMS code where we'd
completely drain an EVO/NVD channel's push buffer when wrapping to the start
again, instead of treating it as a ring buffer.
Let's fix that, finally.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This commit pulls in a bunch of new push buffer macros which are able to
support NVIDIA's class headers, and provide more useful debug output and
error checking (compile-time, where possible) than we had previously.
Will incrementally transition each function over to the unified interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
It technically loads, and runs, but is ultimately pointless outside of
a very narrow window (fanless systems where one wants to attempt using
the, broken for a lot of gm20x, memory reclocking code).
It's also potentially dangerous to override the VBIOS-provided "Pre-OS"
PMU, which would be responsible for fan control otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will prevent some pain with broken firmware trees, as under some
circumstances the HSFW can fail and leave the GPU in a state we don't
know how to recover from.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
