[WHY]:
Lut pipeline will be hooked up differently in some asics
need to add new interfaces and missing registers.
[HOW]:
Add missing registers and hook up programming from DPP for pre-blend
lut.
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Leung <Martin.Leung@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit enables the SubVP feature. To achieve that, we need to:
- Don't force p-state disallow on SubVP (can't block dummy p-state)
- Send calculated watermark to DMCUB for SubVP
- Adjust CAB mode message to PMFW
- Add a proper locking sequence for SubVP
- Various fixes to SubVP static analysis and determining SubVP config
- Currently SubVP not supported with pipe split so merge all pipes
before setting up SubVp
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alan Liu <HaoPing.Liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <Alvin.Lee2@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We are missing some ACP registers/mask value for some specific ASICs.
This commit includes it to those ASICs that support it.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GFX is the only IP block that RAS TA needs to program
the hardware when receiving enable_feature command.
Changed from V1:
remove amdgpu_ras_need_send_ras_feature inline function,
use GFX RAS block check directly.
Signed-off-by: Stanley.Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
We don't need to validate and map root PD specially here,
it would be validated and mapped by amdgpu_vm_validate_pt_bos
if it is evicted.
The special case is when turning a GFX VM to a compute VM,
if vm_update_mode changed, we should make sure root PD gets
mapped. So just map root PD after updating vm->update_funcs
in amdgpu_vm_make_compute whether the vm_update_mode changed
or not.
v3:
- Add some comments suggested by Christian.
v2:
- Don't rename vm_validate_pt_pd_bos and make it public.
Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <Lang.Yu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Sometimes when trying to enable some feature, we have to define some
values with educated guesses, but we mark those values as TBD, which
means "To Be Determined". However, the correct way to approach it is by
loading that information from the firmware. Anyway, some of the values
that we were experimenting with caused this issue:
ERROR: modpost: "__muldf3" [drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.ko] undefined!
This commit fixes this issue by removing the division by two since it is
harmless in this case.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Fixes: 265280b998 ("drm/amd/display: add CLKMGR changes for DCN32/321")
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The synchronize_rcu may take several ms, which noticeably slows down
applications close SMI event handle. Use call_rcu to free client->fifo
and client asynchronously and eliminate the synchronize_rcu call in the
user thread.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SVM range unmapped from GPUs when range is unmapped from CPU, or with
xnack on from MMU notifier when range is evicted or migrated.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Output user queue eviction and restore event. User queue eviction may be
triggered by svm or userptr MMU notifier, TTM eviction, device suspend
and CRIU checkpoint and restore.
User queue restore may be rescheduled if eviction happens again while
restore.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For migration start and end event, output timestamp when migration
starts, ends, svm range address and size, GPU id of migration source and
destination and svm range attributes,
Migration trigger could be prefetch, CPU or GPU page fault and TTM
eviction.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Use ktime_get_boottime_ns() as timestamp to correlate with other
APIs. Output timestamp when GPU recoverable fault starts and ends to
recover the fault, if migration happened or only GPU page table is
updated to recover, fault address, if read or write fault.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Process receive event from same process by default. Add a flag to be
able to receive event from all processes, this requires super user
permission.
Event using pid 0 to send the event to all processes, to keep the
default behavior of existing SMI events.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GFX10 and up have work group processors (WGP) and WGP mode is the native
compile mode.
KFD and ROCr have no visibility into whether a dispatch is operating
in CU or WGP mode.
Enforce CU masking to be pairwise continguous in enablement and
round robin distribute CUs across the SEs in a pairwise manner to
assume WGP mode at all times.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fixes this issue:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:5094: warning: expecting prototype for amdgpu_device_gpu_recover_imp(). Prototype was for amdgpu_device_gpu_recover() instead
Fixes: cf72704414 ("drm/amdgpu: Rename amdgpu_device_gpu_recover_imp back to amdgpu_device_gpu_recover")
Reviewed-by: Kent Russell <kent.russell@amd.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Redundant if-else cases for repeater and non-repeater checks
[How]
Without changing the core logic, rearranged the code by removing
redundant checks
Signed-off-by: Chandan Vurdigere Nataraj <chandan.vurdigerenataraj@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why&How]
Some userspace expect a backwards compatible modifier on DCN32/321. For
hardware with num_pipes more than 16, we expose the most efficient
modifier first. As a fall back method, we need to expose slightly inefficient
modifier AMD_FMT_MOD_TILE_GFX9_64K_R_X after the best option.
Also set the number of packers to fixed value as required per hardware
documentation. This value is cached during hardware initialization and
can be read through the base driver.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This symbol is missing documentation:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/include/amd_shared.h:224: warning: Enum value 'PP_GFX_DCS_MASK' not described in enum 'PP_FEATURE_MASK'
Document it.
Fixes: 680602d6c2 ("drm/amd/pm: enable DCS")
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There are 4 undocumented fields at struct amdgpu_display_manager.
Add documentation for them, fixing those warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h:544: warning: Function parameter or member 'dmub_outbox_params' not described in 'amdgpu_display_manager'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h:544: warning: Function parameter or member 'num_of_edps' not described in 'amdgpu_display_manager'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h:544: warning: Function parameter or member 'disable_hpd_irq' not described in 'amdgpu_display_manager'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h:544: warning: Function parameter or member 'dmub_aux_transfer_done' not described in 'amdgpu_display_manager'
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.h:544: warning: Function parameter or member 'delayed_hpd_wq' not described in 'amdgpu_display_manager'
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
sparse reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/irq/dcn32/irq_service_dcn32.c:39:20: warning: symbol 'to_dal_irq_source_dcn32' was not declared. Should it be static?
to_dal_irq_source_dnc32() is only referenced in irq_service_dnc32.c, so change its
storage class specifier to static.
Fixes: 0efd4374f6 ("drm/amd/display: add dcn32 IRQ changes")
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
sparse reports
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c:3885:6: warning: symbol 'FORCE_RATE' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c:3886:10: warning: symbol 'FORCE_LANE_COUNT' was not declared. Should it be static?
Neither of thse variables is used in dc_link_dp.c. Reviewing the commit listed in
the fixes tag shows neither was used in the original patch. So remove them.
Fixes: 265280b998 ("drm/amd/display: add CLKMGR changes for DCN32/321")
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:
In function 'dc_link_reduce_mst_payload':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link.c:3782:32:
warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
3782 | enum act_return_status ret;
Removed the unused ret variable.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder (HPE) <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Align refcount behaviour for amdgpu_job embedded HW fence with
classic pointer style HW fences by increasing refcount each
time emit is called so amdgpu code doesn't need to make workarounds
using amdgpu_job.job_run_counter to keep the HW fence refcount balanced.
Also since in the previous patch we resumed setting s_fence->parent to NULL
in drm_sched_stop switch to directly checking if job->hw_fence is
signaled to short circuit reset if already signed.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yiqing Yao <yiqing.yao@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Problem:
After we start handling timed out jobs we assume there fences won't be
signaled but we cannot be sure and sometimes they fire late. We need
to prevent concurrent accesses to fence array from
amdgpu_fence_driver_clear_job_fences during GPU reset and amdgpu_fence_process
from a late EOP interrupt.
Fix:
Before accessing fence array in GPU disable EOP interrupt and flush
all pending interrupt handlers for amdgpu device's interrupt line.
v2: Switch from irq_get/put to full enable/disable_irq for amdgpu
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This function should drop the fence refcount when it extracts the
fence from the fence array, just as it's done in amdgpu_fence_process.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Move more stack variable in to dummy vars structure on the heap.
Fixes stack frame size errors:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c: In function 'dml32_ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml/dcn32/display_mode_vba_32.c:3833:1: error: the frame size of 2720 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
3833 | } // ModeSupportAndSystemConfigurationFull
| ^
Fixes: dda4fb85e4 ("drm/amd/display: DML changes for DCN32/321")
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This reverts commit 5089c4a8eb.
This breaks validation and enumeration of display capable modifiers.
The early return true means the rest of the validation code never gets
executed, and we need that to enumerate the right modifiers to userspace
for the format.
The modifiers that are in the initial list generated for a plane are the
superset for all formats and we need the proper checks in this function
to filter some of them out for formats with which they're invalid to be
used.
Furthermore, the safety contract here is that we validate the incoming
modifiers to ensure the kernel can handle them and the display hardware
can handle them. This includes e.g. rejecting multi-plane images with DCC.
Note that the legacy swizzle mechanism allows encoding more swizzles, and
at fb creation time we convert them to modifiers and reject those with
no corresponding modifiers. If we are seeing rejections I'm happy to
help define modifiers that correspond to those, or if absolutely needed
implement a fallback path to allow for less strict validation of the
legacy path.
However, I'd like to revert this patch, since any of these is going to
be a significant rework of the patch, and I'd rather not the regression
gets into a release or forgotten in the meantime.
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
