Linux 5.18-rc5
There was a build fix for arm I wanted in drm-next, so backmerge rather then cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The adev->pm.mutx is already held at the beginning of
amdgpu_dpm_compute_clocks/amdgpu_dpm_enable_uvd/amdgpu_dpm_enable_vce.
But on their calling path, amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update will be
called and thus its sub functions amdgpu_dpm_get_sclk/mclk. They
will then try to acquire the same adev->pm.mutex and deadlock will
occur.
By placing amdgpu_display_bandwidth_update outside of adev->pm.mutex
protection(considering logically they do not need such protection) and
restructuring the call flow accordingly, we can eliminate the deadlock
issue. This comes with no real logics change.
Fixes: 3712e7a494 ("drm/amd/pm: unified lock protections in amdgpu_dpm.c")
Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Reported-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9e689fea-6c69-f4b0-8dee-32c4cf7d8f9c@molgen.mpg.de/
BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1957
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Extend commit 7f36948c92b2 ("amdgpu/pm: Implement new API function "emit" that accepts buffer base and write offset")
Add new hwmgr API function "emit_clock_levels"
- add member emit_clock_levels to pp_hwmgr_func
- Implemented pp_dpm_emit_clock_levels
- add pp_dpm_emit_clock_levels to pp_dpm_funcs
Signed-off-by: Darren Powell <darren.powell@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
On functionality unsupported, -EOPNOTSUPP will be returned. And we rely
on that to determine the fan attributes support.
Fixes: 79c65f3fcb ("drm/amd/pm: do not expose power implementation details to amdgpu_pm.c")
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Avoid cross callings which make lock protection enforcement
on amdgpu_dpm_force_performance_level() impossible.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Drop cross callings and multi-function APIs. Also avoid exposing
internal implementations details.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This better aligns that the caller can make a mistake with the buffer
and -EINVAL should be returned, but if the hardware doesn't support
the feature it should be -EOPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Currently, the readout of fan speed pwm is transited into percent-based
and then pwm-based. However, the transition into percent-based is totally
unnecessary and make the final output less accurate.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This patch is to add one sysfs file -- "pp_od_clk_voltage" for
Raven/Raven2/Picasso APU, which is only used by dGPU like VEGA10.
This sysfs file supports the feature to modify gfx engine clock(Mhz units), it can
be used to configure the min value and the max value for gfx clock limited in the
safe range.
Command guide:
echo "s level clock" > pp_od_clk_voltage
s - adjust teh sclk level
level - 0 or 1, "0" represents the min value, "1" represents the max value
clock - the clock value(Mhz units), like 400, 800 or 1200, the value must be within the
OD_RANGE limits.
Example:
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 200Mhz
1: 1400Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
$ echo "s 0 600" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ echo "s 1 1000" > pp_od_clk_voltage
$ cat pp_od_clk_voltage
OD_SCLK:
0: 600Mhz
1: 1000Mhz
OD_RANGE:
SCLK: 200MHz 1400MHz
Signed-off-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The target is to provide a clear entry point(for power routines).
Also this can help to maintain a clear view about the frameworks
used on different ASICs. Hopefully all these can make power part
more friendly to play with.
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
