Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt:
- Enabling the FPU is now a static_key
- Improvements to the Svpbmt support
- CPU topology bindings for a handful of systems
- Support for systems with 64-bit hart IDs
- Many settings have been enabled in the defconfig, including both
support for the StarFive systems and many of the Docker requirements
There are also a handful of cleanups and improvements, as usual.
* tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.20-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux: (28 commits)
riscv: enable Docker requirements in defconfig
riscv: convert the t-head pbmt errata to use the __nops macro
riscv: introduce nops and __nops macros for NOP sequences
RISC-V: Add fast call path of crash_kexec()
riscv: mmap with PROT_WRITE but no PROT_READ is invalid
riscv/efi_stub: Add 64bit boot-hartid support on RV64
riscv: cpu: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64
riscv: smp: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64
riscv: spinwait: Fix hartid variable type
riscv: cpu_ops_sbi: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64
riscv: dts: sifive: "fix" pmic watchdog node name
riscv: dts: canaan: Add k210 topology information
riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu740 topology information
riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu540 topology information
riscv: dts: starfive: Add JH7100 CPU topology
RISC-V: Add CONFIG_{NON,}PORTABLE
riscv: config: enable SOC_STARFIVE in defconfig
riscv: dts: microchip: Add mpfs' topology information
riscv: Kconfig.socs: Add comments
riscv: Kconfig.erratas: Add comments
...
The initial PolarFire SoC devicetree must have been forked off from
the fu540 one prior to the addition of l2cache controller support being
added there. When the controller node was added to mpfs.dtsi, it was
not hooked up to the CPUs & thus sysfs reports an incorrect cache
configuration. Hook it up.
Fixes: 0fa6107eca ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Marc Kleine-Budde says:
====================
pull-request: can-next 2022-06-25
this is a pull request of 22 patches for net-next/master.
The first 2 patches target the xilinx driver. Srinivas Neeli's patch
adds Transmitter Delay Compensation (TDC) support, a patch by me fixes
a typo.
The next patch is by me and fixes a typo in the m_can driver.
Another patch by me allows the configuration of fixed bit rates
without need for do_set_bittiming callback.
The following 7 patches are by Vincent Mailhol and refactor the
can-dev module and Kbuild, de-inline the can_dropped_invalid_skb()
function, which has grown over the time, and drop outgoing skbs if the
controller is in listen only mode.
Max Staudt's patch fixes a reference in the networking/can.rst
documentation.
Vincent Mailhol provides 2 patches with cleanups for the etas_es58x
driver.
Conor Dooley adds bindings for the mpfs-can to the PolarFire SoC dtsi.
Another patch by me allows the configuration of fixed data bit rates
without need for do_set_data_bittiming callback.
The last 5 patches are by Frank Jungclaus. They prepare the esd_usb
driver to add support for the the CAN-USB/3 device in a later series.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
PolarFire SoC /does/ have a SiFive pdma, despite what I suggested as a
conflict resolution to Zong. Somehow the entry fell through the cracks
between versions of my dt patches, so re-add it with Zong's updated
compatible & dma-channels property.
Fixes: c5094f3710 ("riscv: dts: microchip: refactor icicle kit device tree")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Currently mpfs-fabric.dtsi is included by mpfs.dtsi - which is fine
currently since there is only one board with this SoC upstream.
However if another board was added, it would include the fabric contents
of the Icicle Kit's reference design. To avoid this, rename
mpfs-fabric.dtsi to mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi & include it in the dts
rather than mpfs.dtsi.
mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi specifically matches the 22.03 reference
design for the icicle kit's FPGA fabric & an older version of the
design may not have the i2c or pwm devices - so add the compatible
string to document this.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220509142610.128590-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>