Parallel submission create composite fences (dma_fence_array) for excl /
shared slots in objects. The I915_GEM_BUSY IOCTL checks these slots to
determine the busyness of the object. Prior to patch it only check if
the fence in the slot was a i915_request. Update the check to understand
composite fences and correctly report the busyness.
v2:
(Tvrtko)
- Remove duplicate BUILD_BUG_ON
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211014172005.27155-24-matthew.brost@intel.com
The functions can be called both in _rcu context as well
as while holding the lock.
v2: add some kerneldoc as suggested by Daniel
v3: fix indentation
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602111714.212426-7-christian.koenig@amd.com
When the comment needs to state explicitly that this is doesn't get a reference
to the object then the function is named rather badly.
Rename the function and use it in even more places.
v2: use dma_resv_shared_list as new name
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602111714.212426-5-christian.koenig@amd.com
When the comment needs to state explicitly that this
doesn't get a reference to the object then the function
is named rather badly.
Rename the function and use rcu_dereference_check(), this
way it can be used from both rcu as well as lock protected
critical sections.
v2: improve kerneldoc as suggested by Daniel
v3: use dma_resv_excl_fence as function name
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602111714.212426-4-christian.koenig@amd.com
In our ABI we have defined I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE and
I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_VIRTUAL as negative values which creates
implicit coupling with type widths used in, also ABI, struct
i915_engine_class_instance.
One place where we export engine->uabi_class
I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_VIRTUAL is from our our tracepoints. Because the
type of the former is u8 in contrast to u16 defined in the ABI, 254 will
be returned instead of 65534 which userspace would legitimately expect.
Another place is I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES.
Therefore we need to align the type used to store engine ABI class and
instance.
v2:
* Update the commit message mentioning get_engines and cc stable.
(Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 6d06779e86 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116134508.25211-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 0b3bd0cdc3)
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
This reverts
67c97fb79a ("dma-buf: add reservation_object_fences helper")
dd7a7d1ff2 ("drm/i915: use new reservation_object_fences helper")
0e1d8083bd ("dma-buf: further relax reservation_object_add_shared_fence")
5d344f58da ("dma-buf: nuke reservation_object seq number")
The scenario that defeats simply grabbing a set of shared/exclusive
fences and using them blissfully under RCU is that any of those fences
may be reallocated by a SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU fence slab cache. In this
scenario, while keeping the rcu_read_lock we need to establish that no
fence was changed in the dma_resv after a read (or full) memory barrier.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190814182401.25009-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Be more consistent with the naming of the other DMA-buf objects.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/323401/
Since commit 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to
drm_gem_object"), struct drm_gem_object grew its own builtin
reservation_object rendering our own private one bloat. Remove our
redundant reservation_object and point into obj->base.resv instead.
References: 1ba627148e ("drm: Add reservation_object to drm_gem_object")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618125858.7295-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
