Mapping the imported pages of a DMA-buf into an userspace process
doesn't work as expected.
But we have reoccurring requests on this approach, so split the
functions for this and document that dma_buf_mmap() needs to be used
instead.
v2: split it into two functions
v3: rebased on latest changes
v4: update commit message a bit
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/403838/
This patch updates dma_buf_vunmap() and dma-buf's vunmap callback to
use struct dma_buf_map. The interfaces used to receive a buffer address.
This address is now given in an instance of the structure.
Users of the functions are updated accordingly. This is only an interface
change. It is currently expected that dma-buf memory can be accessed with
system memory load/store operations.
v2:
* include dma-buf-heaps and i915 selftests (kernel test robot)
* initialize cma_obj before using it in drm_gem_cma_free_object()
(kernel test robot)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200925115601.23955-4-tzimmermann@suse.de
This patch updates dma_buf_vmap() and dma-buf's vmap callback to use
struct dma_buf_map.
The interfaces used to return a buffer address. This address now gets
stored in an instance of the structure that is given as an additional
argument. The functions return an errno code on errors.
Users of the functions are updated accordingly. This is only an interface
change. It is currently expected that dma-buf memory can be accessed with
system memory load/store operations.
v3:
* update fastrpc driver (kernel test robot)
v2:
* always clear map parameter in dma_buf_vmap() (Daniel)
* include dma-buf-heaps and i915 selftests (kernel test robot)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200925115601.23955-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
drm-misc-next for 5.10:
UAPI Changes:
Cross-subsystem Changes:
- virtio: Merged a PR for patches that will affect drm/virtio
Core Changes:
- dev: More devm_drm convertions and removal of drm_dev_init
- atomic: Split out drm_atomic_helper_calc_timestamping_constants of
drm_atomic_helper_update_legacy_modeset_state
- ttm: More rework
Driver Changes:
- i915: selftests improvements
- panfrost: support for Amlogic SoC
- vc4: one fix
- tree-wide: conversions to devm_drm_dev_alloc,
- ast: simplifications of the atomic modesetting code
- panfrost: multiple fixes
- vc4: multiple fixes
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200921152956.2gxnsdgxmwhvjyut@gilmour.lan
It is a common operation done by DRM drivers to check the contiguity
of the DMA-mapped buffer described by a scatterlist in the
sg_table object. Let's add a common helper for this operation.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Add drm_device argument to drm_prime_pages_to_sg(), so we can
call dma_max_mapping_size() to figure the segment size limit
and call into __sg_alloc_table_from_pages() with the correct
limit.
This fixes virtio-gpu with sev. Possibly it'll fix other bugs
too given that drm seems to totaly ignore segment size limits
so far ...
v2: place max_segment in drm driver not gem object.
v3: move max_segment next to the other gem fields.
v4: just use dma_max_mapping_size().
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200907112425.15610-2-kraxel@redhat.com
I'm torn on whether drm_minor really should be here or somewhere else.
Maybe with more clarity after untangling drmP.h more this is easier to
decide, for now I've put a FIXME comment right next to it. Right now
we need struct drm_minor for the inline drm_file type helpers, and so
it does kinda make sense to have them here.
Next patch will kerneldoc-ify the entire pile.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170308141257.12119-10-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
