The GEM object is grossly overweight for the practicality of tracking
large numbers of individual pages, yet it is currently our only
abstraction for tracking DMA allocations. Since those allocations need
to be reserved upfront before an operation, and that we need to break
away from simple system memory, we need to ditch using plain struct page
wrappers.
In the process, we drop the WC mapping as we ended up clflushing
everything anyway due to various issues across a wider range of
platforms. Though in a future step, we need to drop the kmap_atomic
approach which suggests we need to pre-map all the pages and keep them
mapped.
v2: Verify our large scratch page is suitably DMA aligned; and manually
clear the scratch since we are allocating plain struct pages full of
prior content.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200729164219.5737-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
On TGL, bits 2-4 in the GGTT PTE are not ignored anymore and are
instead used for some extra VT-d capabilities. We don't (yet?) have
support for those capabilities, but, given that we shared the pte_encode
function betweed GGTT and PPGTT, we still set those bits to the PPGTT
PPAT values. The DMA engine gets very confused when those bits are
set while the iommu is enabled, leading to errors. E.g. when loading
the GuC we get:
[ 9.796218] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
[ 9.796235] DMAR: [DMA Write] Request device [00:02.0] PASID ffffffff fault addr 0 [fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
[ 9.899215] [drm:intel_guc_fw_upload [i915]] *ERROR* GuC firmware signature verification failed
To fix this, just have dedicated gen8_pte_encode function per type of
gtt. Also, explicitly set vm->pte_encode for gen8_ppgtt, even if we
don't use it, to make sure we don't accidentally assign it to the GGTT
one, like we do for gen6_ppgtt, in case we need it in the future.
Reported-by: "Sodhi, Vunny" <vunny.sodhi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200226185657.26445-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
