Having a mode where the display hardware is present but we try
to pretend it isn't just leads to massive headaches when trying
to reason what the fallout might be from skipping some random
bits of programming.
Let's just neuter INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED so that we treat the
hardware as fully present, except we just don't register any
outputs. That's still rather sketchy if the outputs are already
enabled when the driver is loaded. I think the simplest solution
would be to probe everything as normal and just return
disconnected" from all .detect() hooks. That would avoid anything
automagically enabling those outputs, but the driver could then
shut things down using the normal codepaths.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200909213824.12390-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Prepare for making a distinction between not having display and having
disabled display. Add INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() and use it where
HAS_DISPLAY() is used after intel_device_info_runtime_init(). This is
initially duplication, as disabling display still leads to ->pipe_mask =
0 and HAS_DISPLAY() being false.
Note that ever since i915.display_disable was introduced, it has not
affected PCH detection even if it uses HAS_DISPLAY(), as display disable
happens after that.
Since INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() will not make sense unless HAS_DISPLAY()
is true, include a warning for catching misuses making decisions on
INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() when HAS_DISPLAY() is false.
v2: Remove INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED() check from intel_detect_pch() (Chris)
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190913100407.30991-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Our pin mapping tables for ICP and MCC currently only list the standard
GPIO pins used for various output ports. Even through ICP's standard
pin usage only utilizes pins 1, 2, and 9-12, and MCC's standard pin
usage only uses pins 1, 2, and 9, these platforms do still have GPIO
registers to address pins in the range 1-3 and 9-14. OEM's may remap
GPIO usage in non-standard ways (and provide the actual mapping via VBT
settings), so we shouldn't exclude pins on these platforms just because
they aren't part of the standard mappings.
TGP's standard pin tables contains all the possible pins, so let's
rename them to "icp" and use them for all PCH >= PCH_ICP. This will
prevent intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin from rejecting non-standard pin usage
that an OEM specifies via the VBT.
Note that this will cause pin 9 to be labeled as "tc1" instead of "dpc"
in debug messages on platforms with the MCC PCH, but that may actually
help avoid confusion since the text strings will now be the same on all
gen11+ platforms instead of being different on just EHL.
v2: Drop now-unused MCC_DDC_BUS_DDI_* names.
v3: We want to compare against INTEL_PCH_TYPE, not INTEL_PCH_ID.
Bspec: 8417
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817005041.20651-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
