Follow Bspec 31870 to set recommended tuning values for certain GT
register. These values aren't workarounds per-se, but it's best to
handle them in the same general area of the driver, especially since
there may be real workarounds that update other bits of the same
registers.
At the moment the only value we need to worry about is the
TDS_TIMER setting in FF_MODE2. This setting was previously
described as "Wa_1604555607" on some platforms, but the spec
tells us that we should continue to program this on all current
gen12 platforms, even those that do not have that WA.
Bspec: 31870
v2: Rephrase some comments to make them clearer (Matt)
Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210324200502.1731265-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Driver Changes:
- Prepare for local/device memory support on DG1 by starting
to use it for kernel internal allocations: context, ring
and engine scratch (Matt A, CQ, Abdiel, Imre)
- Sandybridge fix to avoid hard hang on ring resume (Chris)
- Limit imported dma-buf size to int32 (Matt A)
- Double check heartbeat timeout before resetting (Chris)
- Use new tasklet API for execution list (Emil)
- Fix SPDX checkpats warnings (Chris)
- Fixes for various checkpatch warnings (Chris)
- Selftest improvements (Chris)
- Move the defer_request waiter active assertion to correct spot (Chris)
- Make local-memory probing a GT operation (Matt, Tvrtko)
- Protect against request freeing during cancellation on wedging (Chris)
- Retire unexpected starting state error dumping (Chris)
- Distinction of memory regions in debugging (Zbigniew)
- Always flush the submission queue on checking for idle (Chris)
- Consolidate 2big error check to helper (Matt)
- Decrease number of subplatform bits (Tvrtko)
- Remove unused internal request priority levels (Chris)
- Document the unused internal header bits in buddy allocator (Matt)
- Cleanup the region class/instance encoding (Matt)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YGxksaZGXHnFxlwg@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com
- Add the initial platform information for Alderlake-S.
- Specify ppgtt_size value
- Add dma_mask_size
- Add ADLS REVIDs
- HW tracking(Selective Update Tracking Enable) has been
removed from ADLS. Disable PSR2 till we enable software/
manual tracking.
v2:
- Add support for different ADLS SOC steppings to select
correct GT/DISP stepping based on Bspec 53655 based on
feedback from Matt Roper.(aswarup)
v3:
- Make display/gt steppings info generic for reuse with TGL and ADLS.
- Modify the macros to reuse tgl_revids_get()
- Add HTI support to adls device info.(mdroper)
v4:
- Rebase on TGL patch for applying WAs based on stepping info from
Matt Roper's feedback.(aswarup)
v5:
- Replace macros with PCI IDs in revid to stepping table.
v6: remove stray adls_revids (Lucas)
Bspec: 53597
Bspec: 53648
Bspec: 53655
Bspec: 48028
Bspec: 53650
BSpec: 50422
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The use of "masked" in this function is due to its history. Once upon a
time it received a mask and a value as parameter. Since
commit eeec73f8a4 ("drm/i915/gt: Skip rmw for masked registers")
that is not true anymore and now there is a clear and a set parameter.
Depending on the case, that can still be thought as a mask and value,
but there are some subtle differences: what we clear doesn't need to be
the same bits we are setting, particularly when we are using masked
registers.
The fact that we also have "masked registers", i.e. registers whose mask
is stored in the upper 16 bits of the register, makes it even more
confusing, because "masked" in wa_write_masked_or() has little to do
with masked registers, but rather refers to the old mask parameter the
function received (that can also, but not exclusively, be used to write
to masked register).
Avoid the ambiguity and misnomer by renaming it to something else,
hopefully less confusing: wa_write_clr_set(), to designate that we are
doing both clr and set operations in the register.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
When using masked registers, there is nothing to clear since a masked
register has the mask in the upper 16b: we can just write to the
location we want and use the mask to control what bits we are writing
to.
However that doesn't mean we don't want to read back the register and
check the value actually matched what we wanted to write, i.e. that
the WA stick. That should be an explicit opt-out for registers that are
either write-only or that are affected by hardware misbehavior.
Moreover both wa_masked_en() and wa_masked_dis() check the WA stick, so
skipping the check just because the field is more than 1 bit is
surprising and error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201209045246.2905675-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The updated bspec forcewake table also provides us with new multicast
ranges that should be reflected in our workaround code.
Note that there are different types of multicast registers with
different styles of replication and different steering registers. The
i915 MCR range lists we're updating here are only used to ensure we can
verify workarounds properly (i.e., if we can't steer register reads we
don't want to verify workarounds where an unsteered read might hit a
fused-off instance of the unit). Because of this, we don't need to
include any of the multicast ranges where all instances of the register
will always present and fusing doesn't play a role. Specifically, that
means that we are not including the MCR ranges designated as "SQIDI" in
the bspec.
Bspec: 66696
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <caz.yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201009194442.3668677-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
We usually assume that increasing PCI device revision ID's translates to
newer steppings; macros like IS_KBL_REVID() that we use rely on this
behavior. Unfortunately this turns out to not be true on KBL; the
newer device 2 revision ID's sometimes go backward to older steppings.
The situation is further complicated by different GT and display
steppings associated with each revision ID.
Let's work around this by providing a table to map the revision ID to
specific GT and display steppings, and then perform our comparisons on
the mapped values.
v2:
- Move the kbl_revids[] array to intel_workarounds.c to avoid compiler
warnings about an unused variable in files that don't call the
macros (kernel test robot).
Bspec: 18329
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200811032105.2819370-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Swathi Dhanavanthri <swathi.dhanavanthri@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
