We need to move to a more flexible timeline that doesn't assume one
fence context per engine, and so allow for a single timeline to be used
across a combination of engines. This means that preallocating a fence
context per engine is now a hindrance, and so we want to introduce the
singular timeline. From the code perspective, this has the notable
advantage of clearing up a lot of mirky semantics and some clumsy
pointer chasing.
By splitting the timeline up into a single entity rather than an array
of per-engine timelines, we can realise the goal of the previous patch
of tracking the timeline alongside the ring.
v2: Tweak wait_for_idle to stop the compiling thinking that ret may be
uninitialised.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180502163839.3248-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but
in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects
of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the
frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for
scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience.
v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and
ye olde gcc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.
This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
definition.
v8:
- Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
- Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)
v9:
- Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)
v10:
- Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
to avoid potential issues (Joonas)
v13:
- Updated the ordering of s-o-b/cc/r-b tags (Sagar)
Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v8)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v9)
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> (v11)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v12)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1520987574-19351-1-git-send-email-yaodong.li@intel.com
Since we're inhibiting context save of preempt context, we're no longer
tracking the position of HEAD/TAIL. With GuC, we're adding a new
breadcrumb for each preemption, which means that the HW will do more and
more breadcrumb writes. Eventually the ring is filled, and we're
submitting the preemption context with HEAD==TAIL==0, which won't result
in breadcrumb write, but will trigger hangcheck instead.
Instead of writing a new preempt breadcrumb for each preemption, let's
just fill the ring once at init time (which also saves a couple of
instructions in the tasklet).
v2: Assert that context save restore is inhibited, don't assert on ring
alignment. (Chris)
v3: Cleanup checkpatch.
Fixes: 517aaffe0c ("drm/i915/execlists: Inhibit context save/restore for the fake preempt context")
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180226163800.21745-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Sometimes we need to boost the priority of an in-flight request, which
may lead to the situation where the second submission port then contains
a higher priority context than the first and so we need to inject a
preemption event. To do so we must always check inside
execlists_dequeue() whether there is a priority inversion between the
ports themselves as well as the head of the priority sorted queue, and we
cannot just skip dequeuing if the queue is empty.
As Michał noted, this doesn't simply extend to handling more than 2-port
submission, as we may need to reorder within the array of executing
requests which themselves are lower priority than the first. A task for
later!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180222142229.14517-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Full GPU reset causes GuC to be reset. This means that every time we're
doing a reset, we need to talk to GuC and tell it about doorbells.
Let's separate the communication part (create_doorbell) from our
internal bookkeeping (reserve_doorbell) so that we can cleanly separate
the initialization done at module load from reinitialization done at
reset in the following patch.
While I'm here, let's also add a proper (although slightly asymetric)
cleanup that doesn't try to communicate with GuC after it's already
gone, getting rid of "expected" warnings caused by GuC action failures
on module unload.
Note that I've also removed one of the tests (bitmap out of sync), since
it doesn't make much sense anymore - bitmaps are now not expected to
change during the lifetime of a client.
Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-5-michal.winiarski@intel.com
Sagar noticed the check can be consolidated between the engine stats
implementation and the PMU.
My first choice was a static inline helper but that got into include
ordering mess quickly fast so I went with a macro instead. At some point
we should perhaps looking into taking out the non-ringubffer bits from
intel_ringbuffer.h into a new intel_engine.h or something.
v2: Use engine->flags. (Chris Wilson)
v3: Rebase and mark GuC as not yet supported. (Chris Wilson)
v4: Move flag setting to intel_engines_reset_default_submission.
(Chris Wilson)
v5: Move flag setting to logical_ring_setup.
v6: intel_engines_reset_default_submission is the wrong place to set the
flag - it needs to be in execlists_set_default_submission. (Sagar)
v7: Flag setting in logical_ring_setup is not required. (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> (v6)
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171129102805.22690-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
The first test aims to check guc_init_doorbell_hw, changing the existing
guc clients and doorbells state before calling it.
The second test tries to create as many clients as it is currently possible
(currently limited to max number of doorbells) and exercise the doorbell
alloc/dealloc code.
Since our usage mode require very few clients/doorbells, this code has
been exercised very lightly and it's good to have a simple test for it.
As reference, this test already helped identify the bug fixed by
commit 7f1ea2ac30 ("drm/i915/guc: Fix doorbell id selection").
v2: Extend number of clients; check for client allocation failure when
number of doorbells is exceeded; validate client properties; reuse
guc_init_doorbell_hw (Chris).
v3: guc_init_doorbell_hw test added per Chris suggestion.
v4: Try to explain why guc_init_doorbell_hw exist and comment some
details in the subtest.
v5: Remove redundant pr_info at the beginning of each subtest (Chris);
rebase (s/i915_guc_client/intel_guc_client/).
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171116220632.1909-1-michel.thierry@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
