The NAND chip parameter page is statically allocated within the
nand_chip structure, which reserves a lot of space. Even not ONFI nor
JEDEC chips have it embedded. Also, only a few parameters are actually
read from the parameter page after the detection.
ONFI-related parameters that will be used outside from the
identification function are stored in a separate onfi_parameters
structure embedded in nand_parameters, this small structure that
already hold generic parameters.
For now, the onfi_parameters structure is allocated statically. However,
after some deep rework in the NAND framework, it will be possible to do
dynamic allocations from the NAND identification phase, and this
strcuture will then be dynamically allocated when needed.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
The NAND chip parameter page is statically allocated within the
nand_chip structure, which reserves a lot of space. Even not ONFI nor
JEDEC chips have it embedded. Also, only a few parameters are actually
read from the parameter page after the detection.
To prepare to the removal of such huge structure, a small NAND parameter
structure is allocated statically and contains only very few members
that are generic to all chips and actually used elsewhere in the code.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
After a nand_reset_data_interface(), both the NAND chip and the NAND
controller use timing mode 0. The previously defined data interface for
this chip has been saved and is supposed to be restored after that.
However, if the saved data interface also refers to timing mode 0, there
is no need to re-apply them again.
Also, as nand_setup_data_interface() uses ->set/get_features(), it could
lead to issues when doing the reset at probe time as the parameter page
is not available yet to know if these functions are supported or not.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Choosing ONFI timings when ->set/get_features() calls are supported
by the NAND chip is a matter of reading the chip's ONFI parameter page
and telling the chip the chosen mode (between all of the supported ones)
with ->set_feature().
Add a check on whether the chip "acked" the timing mode or not.
This can be a problem for NAND chips that do not follow entirely the
ONFI specification. These chips actually support other modes than
"mode 0", but either:
1/ do not update the timing mode register once a timing mode has been
selected.
or
2/ do not support the TIMING_MODE featured and thus do not require users
to change the timing mode at all.
These issues will be addressed in another patch that will add the
feature to overwrite NAND chips features within the parameter page, from
the NAND chip driver.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
After a ->set_features(TIMINGS), the chip is supposed to be working at a
new speed. In order for all the transactions to be perperly handled, the
NAND controller should also be configured to this same speed. Calling
->setup_data_interface() is not enough and the chip should be
de-asserted/re-asserted through calls to ->select_chip().
Prepare the next change in nand_setup_data_interface() where timings
will be checked after being applied. Because assertions of the CS pin
will be needed from within this function, move the calls to
->select_chip() inside nand_setup_data_interface() for later
consistency.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Usually, the source of the error when setting/getting features does not
matter (if the controller does not support sending the command or if
the chip does not support the operation).
When it comes to timings, if the controller fails it is an error while
if the chip does not support the operation, it can be silently supposed
that it already works with the maximum supported timings.
Introduce some logic in nand_setup_data_interface() to handle that
difference.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Prepare the fact that some features managed by GET/SET_FEATURES could be
overloaded by vendor code. To handle this logic, use new wrappers
instead of directly call the ->get/set_features() hooks.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
SET/GET FEATURES are flagged ONFI-compliant because of their name. This
is not accurate as non-ONFI NAND chips support it and use it.
Rename the hooks and helpers to remove the "onfi" prefix.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Prepare future work on the ->onfi_get/set_features() hooks by renaming
the core's implementation as 'default' ones.
Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
As part of the process of sharing more code between different NAND
based devices, we need to move all raw NAND related code to the raw/
subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
