btf__dedup() and struct btf_dedup_opts were added before we figured out
OPTS mechanism. As such, btf_dedup_opts is non-extensible without
breaking an ABI and potentially crashing user application.
Unfortunately, btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts are short and succinct
names that would be great to preserve and use going forward. So we use
___libbpf_override() macro approach, used previously for bpf_prog_load()
API, to define a new btf__dedup() variant that accepts only struct btf *
and struct btf_dedup_opts * arguments, and rename the old btf__dedup()
implementation into btf__dedup_deprecated(). This keeps both source and
binary compatibility with old and new applications.
The biggest problem was struct btf_dedup_opts, which wasn't OPTS-based,
and as such doesn't have `size_t sz;` as a first field. But btf__dedup()
is a pretty rarely used API and I believe that the only currently known
users (besides selftests) are libbpf's own bpf_linker and pahole.
Neither use case actually uses options and just passes NULL. So instead
of doing extra hacks, just rewrite struct btf_dedup_opts into OPTS-based
one, move btf_ext argument into those opts (only bpf_linker needs to
dedup btf_ext, so it's not a typical thing to specify), and drop never
used `dont_resolve_fwds` option (it was never used anywhere, AFAIK, it
makes BTF dedup much less useful and efficient).
Just in case, for old implementation, btf__dedup_deprecated(), detect
non-NULL options and error out with helpful message, to help users
migrate, if there are any user playing with btf__dedup().
The last remaining piece is dedup_table_size, which is another
anachronism from very early days of BTF dedup. Since then it has been
reduced to the only valid value, 1, to request forced hash collisions.
This is only used during testing. So instead introduce a bool flag to
force collisions explicitly.
This patch also adapts selftests to new btf__dedup() and btf_dedup_opts
use to avoid selftests breakage.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/281
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-4-andrii@kernel.org
Few clean ups and single-line simplifications. Also split CLEAN command
into multiple $(RM) invocations as it gets dangerously close to too long
argument list. Make sure that -o <output.o> is used always as the last
argument for saner verbose make output.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111053624.190580-3-andrii@kernel.org
After recent refactoring bpf_prog_test_load(), used across multiple
selftests, lost ability to specify extra log_level 1 or 2 (for -vv and
-vvv, respectively). Fix that problem by using bpf_object__load_xattr()
API that supports extra log_level flags. Also restore
BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 prog_flags by utilizing new bpf_program__set_extra_flags()
API.
Fixes: f87c1930ac ("selftests/bpf: Merge test_stub.c into testing_helpers.c")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211111051758.92283-3-andrii@kernel.org
Exception handling is triggered in BPF tracing programs when a NULL pointer
is dereferenced; the exception handler zeroes the target register and
execution of the BPF program progresses.
To test exception handling then, we need to trigger a NULL pointer dereference
for a field which should never be zero; if it is, the only explanation is the
exception handler ran. task->task_works is the NULL pointer chosen (for a new
task from fork() no work is associated), and the task_works->func field should
not be zero if task_works is non-NULL. The test verifies that task_works and
task_works->func are 0.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636131046-5982-3-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Add tests for bpf_find_vma in perf_event program and kprobe program. The
perf_event program is triggered from NMI context, so the second call of
bpf_find_vma() will return -EBUSY (irq_work busy). The kprobe program,
on the other hand, does not have this constraint.
Also add tests for illegal writes to task or vma from the callback
function. The verifier should reject both cases.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211105232330.1936330-3-songliubraving@fb.com
Add a new unified OPTS-based low-level API for program loading,
bpf_prog_load() ([0]). bpf_prog_load() accepts few "mandatory"
parameters as input arguments (program type, name, license,
instructions) and all the other optional (as in not required to specify
for all types of BPF programs) fields into struct bpf_prog_load_opts.
This makes all the other non-extensible APIs variant for BPF_PROG_LOAD
obsolete and they are slated for deprecation in libbpf v0.7:
- bpf_load_program();
- bpf_load_program_xattr();
- bpf_verify_program().
Implementation-wise, internal helper libbpf__bpf_prog_load is refactored
to become a public bpf_prog_load() API. struct bpf_prog_load_params used
internally is replaced by public struct bpf_prog_load_opts.
Unfortunately, while conceptually all this is pretty straightforward,
the biggest complication comes from the already existing bpf_prog_load()
*high-level* API, which has nothing to do with BPF_PROG_LOAD command.
We try really hard to have a new API named bpf_prog_load(), though,
because it maps naturally to BPF_PROG_LOAD command.
For that, we rename old bpf_prog_load() into bpf_prog_load_deprecated()
and mark it as COMPAT_VERSION() for shared library users compiled
against old version of libbpf. Statically linked users and shared lib
users compiled against new version of libbpf headers will get "rerouted"
to bpf_prog_deprecated() through a macro helper that decides whether to
use new or old bpf_prog_load() based on number of input arguments (see
___libbpf_overload in libbpf_common.h).
To test that existing
bpf_prog_load()-using code compiles and works as expected, I've compiled
and ran selftests as is. I had to remove (locally) selftest/bpf/Makefile
-Dbpf_prog_load=bpf_prog_test_load hack because it was conflicting with
the macro-based overload approach. I don't expect anyone else to do
something like this in practice, though. This is testing-specific way to
replace bpf_prog_load() calls with special testing variant of it, which
adds extra prog_flags value. After testing I kept this selftests hack,
but ensured that we use a new bpf_prog_load_deprecated name for this.
This patch also marks bpf_prog_load() and bpf_prog_load_xattr() as deprecated.
bpf_object interface has to be used for working with struct bpf_program.
Libbpf doesn't support loading just a bpf_program.
The silver lining is that when we get to libbpf 1.0 all these
complication will be gone and we'll have one clean bpf_prog_load()
low-level API with no backwards compatibility hackery surrounding it.
[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/284
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103220845.2676888-4-andrii@kernel.org
As I want to test both DEVMAP and DEVMAP_HASH in XDP multicast redirect, I
limited DEVMAP max entries to a small value for performace. When the test
runs after amount of interface creating/deleting tests. The interface index
will exceed the map max entries and xdp_redirect_multi will error out with
"Get interfacesInterface index to large".
Fix this issue by limit the tests in netns and specify the ifindex when
creating interfaces.
Fixes: d232924762 ("selftests/bpf: Add xdp_redirect_multi test")
Reported-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027033553.962413-5-liuhangbin@gmail.com
When running `./test_progs -j` test_netcnt fails with a very high
probability, undercounting number of packets received (9999 vs expected
10000). It seems to be conflicting with other cgroup/skb selftests. So
make it serial for now to make parallel mode more robust.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211103054113.2130582-1-andrii@kernel.org
Add tests to exercise the behaviour of RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_NOREPLACE
on bpffs. The former checks that after an exchange the inode of two
directories has changed. The latter checks that the source still exists
after a failed rename. Generally, having support for renameat2(RENAME_EXCHANGE)
in bpffs fixes atomic upgrades of our sk_lookup control plane.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028094724.59043-5-lmb@cloudflare.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-11-01
We've added 181 non-merge commits during the last 28 day(s) which contain
a total of 280 files changed, 11791 insertions(+), 5879 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix bpf verifier propagation of 64-bit bounds, from Alexei.
2) Parallelize bpf test_progs, from Yucong and Andrii.
3) Deprecate various libbpf apis including af_xdp, from Andrii, Hengqi, Magnus.
4) Improve bpf selftests on s390, from Ilya.
5) bloomfilter bpf map type, from Joanne.
6) Big improvements to JIT tests especially on Mips, from Johan.
7) Support kernel module function calls from bpf, from Kumar.
8) Support typeless and weak ksym in light skeleton, from Kumar.
9) Disallow unprivileged bpf by default, from Pawan.
10) BTF_KIND_DECL_TAG support, from Yonghong.
11) Various bpftool cleanups, from Quentin.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (181 commits)
libbpf: Deprecate AF_XDP support
kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules
selftests/bpf: Add a testcase for 64-bit bounds propagation issue.
bpf: Fix propagation of signed bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit.
bpf: Fix propagation of bounds from 64-bit min/max into 32-bit and var_off.
selftests/bpf: Fix also no-alu32 strobemeta selftest
bpf: Add missing map_delete_elem method to bloom filter map
selftests/bpf: Add bloom map success test for userspace calls
bpf: Add alignment padding for "map_extra" + consolidate holes
bpf: Bloom filter map naming fixups
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for struct_ops prog
bpf: Add dummy BPF STRUCT_OPS for test purpose
bpf: Factor out helpers for ctx access checking
bpf: Factor out a helper to prepare trampoline for struct_ops prog
selftests, bpf: Fix broken riscv build
riscv, libbpf: Add RISC-V (RV64) support to bpf_tracing.h
tools, build: Add RISC-V to HOSTARCH parsing
riscv, bpf: Increase the maximum number of iterations
selftests, bpf: Add one test for sockmap with strparser
selftests, bpf: Fix test_txmsg_ingress_parser error
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211102013123.9005-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
./test_progs-no_alu32 -vv -t twfw
Before the 64-bit_into_32-bit fix:
19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6
R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0xff),s32_max_value=255,u32_max_value=255)
and eventually:
invalid access to map value, value_size=8 off=7 size=8
R6 max value is outside of the allowed memory range
libbpf: failed to load object 'no_alu32/twfw.o'
After the fix:
19: (25) if r1 > 0x3f goto pc+6
R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=63,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f))
verif_twfw:OK
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Before this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
After this fix:
166: (b5) if r2 <= 0x1 goto pc+22
from 166 to 189: R2=invP(id=1,umax_value=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
While processing BPF_JLE the reg_set_min_max() would set true_reg->umax_value = 1
and call __reg_combine_64_into_32(true_reg).
Without the fix it would not pass the condition:
if (__reg64_bound_u32(reg->umin_value) && __reg64_bound_u32(reg->umax_value))
since umin_value == 0 at this point.
Before commit 10bf4e8316 the umin was incorrectly ingored.
The commit 10bf4e8316 fixed the correctness issue, but pessimized
propagation of 64-bit min max into 32-bit min max and corresponding var_off.
Fixes: 10bf4e8316 ("bpf: Fix propagation of 32 bit unsigned bounds from 64 bit bounds")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101222153.78759-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Previous fix aded bpf_clamp_umax() helper use to re-validate boundaries.
While that works correctly, it introduces more branches, which blows up
past 1 million instructions in no-alu32 variant of strobemeta selftests.
Switching len variable from u32 to u64 also fixes the issue and reduces
the number of validated instructions, so use that instead. Fix this
patch and bpf_clamp_umax() removed, both alu32 and no-alu32 selftests
pass.
Fixes: 0133c20480 ("selftests/bpf: Fix strobemeta selftest regression")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211101230118.1273019-1-andrii@kernel.org
This patch has two changes:
1) Adds a new function "test_success_cases" to test
successfully creating + adding + looking up a value
in a bloom filter map from the userspace side.
2) Use bpf_create_map instead of bpf_create_map_xattr in
the "test_fail_cases" and test_inner_map to make the
code look cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029224909.1721024-4-joannekoong@fb.com
Running a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog for dummy_st_ops::test_N()
through bpf_prog_test_run(). Four test cases are added:
(1) attach dummy_st_ops should fail
(2) function return value of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() is expected
(3) pointer argument of bpf_dummy_ops::test_1() works as expected
(4) multiple arguments passed to bpf_dummy_ops::test_2() are correct
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211025064025.2567443-5-houtao1@huawei.com
This patch is closely related to commit 6016df8fe8 ("selftests/bpf:
Fix broken riscv build"). When clang includes the system include
directories, but targeting BPF program, __BITS_PER_LONG defaults to
32, unless explicitly set. Work around this problem, by explicitly
setting __BITS_PER_LONG to __riscv_xlen.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028161057.520552-5-bjorn@kernel.org
After "skmsg: lose offset info in sk_psock_skb_ingress", the test case
with ktls failed. This because ktls parser(tls_read_size) return value
is 285 not 256.
The case like this:
tls_sk1 --> redir_sk --> tls_sk2
tls_sk1 sent out 512 bytes data, after tls related processing redir_sk
recved 570 btyes data, and redirect 512 (skb_use_parser) bytes data to
tls_sk2; but tls_sk2 needs 285 * 2 bytes data, receive timeout occurred.
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211029141216.211899-2-liujian56@huawei.com
Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4 ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")
We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.
The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.
Fixes: 0ab5539f85 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
Also, avoid using CO-RE features, as lskel doesn't support CO-RE, yet.
Include both light and libbpf skeleton in same file to test both of them
together.
In c48e51c8b0 ("bpf: selftests: Add selftests for module kfunc support"),
I added support for generating both lskel and libbpf skel for a BPF
object, however the name parameter for bpftool caused collisions when
included in same file together. This meant that every test needed a
separate file for a libbpf/light skeleton separation instead of
subtests.
Change that by appending a "_lskel" suffix to the name for files using
light skeleton, and convert all existing users.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-7-memxor@gmail.com
This patch adds benchmark tests for comparing the performance of hashmap
lookups without the bloom filter vs. hashmap lookups with the bloom filter.
Checking the bloom filter first for whether the element exists should
overall enable a higher throughput for hashmap lookups, since if the
element does not exist in the bloom filter, we can avoid a costly lookup in
the hashmap.
On average, using 5 hash functions in the bloom filter tended to perform
the best across the widest range of different entry sizes. The benchmark
results using 5 hash functions (running on 8 threads on a machine with one
numa node, and taking the average of 3 runs) were roughly as follows:
value_size = 4 bytes -
10k entries: 30% faster
50k entries: 40% faster
100k entries: 40% faster
500k entres: 70% faster
1 million entries: 90% faster
5 million entries: 140% faster
value_size = 8 bytes -
10k entries: 30% faster
50k entries: 40% faster
100k entries: 50% faster
500k entres: 80% faster
1 million entries: 100% faster
5 million entries: 150% faster
value_size = 16 bytes -
10k entries: 20% faster
50k entries: 30% faster
100k entries: 35% faster
500k entres: 65% faster
1 million entries: 85% faster
5 million entries: 110% faster
value_size = 40 bytes -
10k entries: 5% faster
50k entries: 15% faster
100k entries: 20% faster
500k entres: 65% faster
1 million entries: 75% faster
5 million entries: 120% faster
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-6-joannekoong@fb.com
This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput (for lookups + updates)
and the false positive rate of bloom filter lookups, as well as some
minor refactoring of the bash script for running the benchmarks.
These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases,
the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter decreases.
>From the benchmark data, the approximate average false-positive rates
are roughly as follows:
1 hash function = ~30%
2 hash functions = ~15%
3 hash functions = ~5%
4 hash functions = ~2.5%
5 hash functions = ~1%
6 hash functions = ~0.5%
7 hash functions = ~0.35%
8 hash functions = ~0.15%
9 hash functions = ~0.1%
10 hash functions = ~0%
For reference data, the benchmarks run on one thread on a machine
with one numa node for 1 to 5 hash functions for 8-byte and 64-byte
values are as follows:
1 hash function:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.1 M/s operations
Updates - 33.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.15%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.7 M/s operations
Updates - 15.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.2%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 51.0 M/s operations
Updates - 33.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.04%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 24.06%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 50.5 M/s operations
Updates - 33.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.6 M/s operations
Updates - 14.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.42%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 49.7 M/s operations
Updates - 32.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.4 M/s operations
Updates - 13.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 27.58%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 47.2 M/s operations
Updates - 31.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.94%
64-byte value
Lookups - 15.3 M/s operations
Updates - 13.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.95%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 41.1 M/s operations
Updates - 28.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 31.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 13.3 M/s operations
Updates - 11.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 30.98%
2 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 34.1 M/s operations
Updates - 20.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.21%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 33.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.13%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 9.19%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 32.7 M/s operations
Updates - 18.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.4 M/s operations
Updates - 7.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.61%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 30.6 M/s operations
Updates - 18.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.54%
64-byte value
Lookups - 8.0 M/s operations
Updates - 7.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 12.52%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.3 M/s operations
Updates - 16.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.77%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.9 M/s operations
Updates - 6.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.88%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 20.8 M/s operations
Updates - 14.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 7.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 16.78%
3 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 25.1 M/s operations
Updates - 14.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.65%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.5 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.58%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 24.7 M/s operations
Updates - 14.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.71%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.8 M/s operations
Updates - 5.3 M/s operations
False positive rate: 7.62%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 22.9 M/s operations
Updates - 13.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.62%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.6 M/s operations
Updates - 4.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.7%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.8 M/s operations
Updates - 12.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.60%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.3 M/s operations
Updates - 4.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.69%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.49%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.9 M/s operations
Updates - 4.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.41%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.8 M/s operations
Updates - 9.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.45%
64-byte value
Lookups - 5.2 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 4.54%
4 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.7 M/s operations
Updates - 11.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.01%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.4 M/s operations
Updates - 4.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 19.5 M/s operations
Updates - 10.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.00%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.97%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 18.2 M/s operations
Updates - 10.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.3 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 2.05%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.5 M/s operations
Updates - 9.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
64-byte value
Lookups - 4.0 M/s operations
Updates - 3.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.99%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.8 M/s operations
Updates - 7.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.91%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.7 M/s operations
Updates - 3.6 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.78%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.0 M/s operations
Updates - 6.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.93%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 3.39%
5 hash functions:
50k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.4 M/s operations
Updates - 9.1 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.77%
100k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 16.3 M/s operations
Updates - 9.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.79%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.5 M/s operations
Updates - 3.2 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.78%
500k entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 15.1 M/s operations
Updates - 8.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.82%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.4 M/s operations
Updates - 3.0 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.78%
1 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 13.2 M/s operations
Updates - 7.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.81%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.8 M/s operations
False positive rate: 1.80%
2.5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 10.5 M/s operations
Updates - 5.9 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.29%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.4 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.28%
5 mil entries
8-byte value
Lookups - 9.6 M/s operations
Updates - 5.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
64-byte value
Lookups - 3.2 M/s operations
Updates - 2.7 M/s operations
False positive rate: 0.30%
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027234504.30744-5-joannekoong@fb.com
