cpu_to_be16() returns __be16 value but the driver uses u16 and that's
incorrect. Fix it by using __be16 as the data type of bdf_be variable.
The issue was spotted by the below sparse warning:
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c:1305:30: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [usertype] bdf_be @@ got restricted __be16 [usertype] @@
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c:1305:30: sparse: expected unsigned short [usertype] bdf_be
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c:1305:30: sparse: got restricted __be16 [usertype]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211130080924.266116-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@linux.com>
The current assignment to the class_revision member
class_revision |= cpu_to_le32(PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 16);
can make the reader think that class is at high 16 bits of the member and
revision at low 16 bits.
In reality, class is at high 24 bits, but the class for PCI Bridge Normal
Decode is PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 8.
Change the assignment and add a comment to make this clearer.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211130172913.9727-2-kabel@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
This reverts commit 239edf686c.
239edf686c ("PCI: aardvark: Fix support for PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 on emulated
bridge") added support for the Type 1 Expansion ROM BAR at config offset
0x38, based on the register being listed in the Marvell Armada A3720 spec.
But the spec doesn't document it at all for RC mode, and there is no ROM in
the SOC, so remove this emulation for now.
The PCI bridge which represents aardvark's PCIe Root Port has an Expansion
ROM Base Address register at offset 0x30, but its meaning is different than
PCI's Expansion ROM BAR register, although the layout is the same. (This
is why we thought it does the same thing.)
First: there is no ROM (or part of BootROM) in the A3720 SOC dedicated for
PCIe Root Port (or controller in RC mode) containing executable code that
would initialize the Root Port, suitable for execution in bootloader (this
is how Expansion ROM BAR is used on x86).
Second: in A3720 spec the register (address 0xD0070030) is not documented
at all for Root Complex mode, but similar to other BAR registers, it has an
"entangled partner" in register 0xD0075920, which does address translation
for the BAR in 0xD0070030:
- the BAR register sets the address from the view of PCIe bus
- the translation register sets the address from the view of the CPU
The other BAR registers also have this entangled partner, and they can be
used to:
- in RC mode: address-checking on the receive side of the RC (they can
define address ranges for memory accesses from remote Endpoints to the
RC)
- in Endpoint mode: allow the remote CPU to access memory on A3720
The Expansion ROM BAR has only the Endpoint part documented, but from the
similarities we think that it can also be used in RC mode in that way.
So either Expansion ROM BAR has different meaning (if the hypothesis above
is true), or we don't know it's meaning (since it is not documented for RC
mode).
Remove the register from the emulated bridge accessing functions.
[bhelgaas: summarize reason for removal (first paragraph)]
Fixes: 239edf686c ("PCI: aardvark: Fix support for PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1 on emulated bridge")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211125160148.26029-3-kabel@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Now after pci_ioremap_io() usage was replaced by devm_pci_remap_iospace()
function, there is no need to use custom mvebu_pci_host_probe() function.
Current implementation of mvebu_pci_host_probe() is same as standard PCI
core function pci_host_probe(). So replace mvebu_pci_host_probe() call by
pci_host_probe() and remove custom mvebu_pci_host_probe() function.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211124154116.916-4-pali@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Now when ARM architecture code also provides standard PCI core function
pci_remap_iospace(), use its devm_pci_remap_iospace() variant in
pci-mvebu.c driver instead of old ARM-specific pci_ioremap_io() function.
Call devm_pci_remap_iospace() before adding IO resource to host bridge
structure, at the place where it should be.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211124154116.916-3-pali@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
When the DVFSRC (dynamic voltage and frequency scaling resource collector)
feature is not implemented, the PCIe hardware will assert a voltage request
signal when exit from the L1 PM Substates to request a specific Vcore
voltage, but cannot receive the voltage ready signal, which will cause
the link to fail to exit the L1 PM Substates.
Disable DVFSRC voltage request by default, we need to find a common way to
enable it in the future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211015063602.29058-1-jianjun.wang@mediatek.com
Fixes: d3bf75b579 ("PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MediaTek Gen3 driver for MT8192")
Tested-by: Qizhong Cheng <qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
In quirk_huawei_pcie_sva(), device_add_properties() is used to
inject additional device properties, but there is no
device_remove_properties() call anywhere to remove those
properties. The assumption is most likely that the device is
never removed, and the properties therefore do not also never
need to be removed.
Even though it is unlikely that the device is ever removed in
this case, it is safer to make sure that the properties are
also removed if the device ever does get unregistered.
To achieve this, instead of adding a separate quirk for the
case of device removal where device_remove_properties() is
called, using device_create_managed_software_node() instead of
device_add_properties(). Both functions create a software node
(a type of fwnode) that holds the device properties, which is
then assigned to the device very much the same way.
The difference between the two functions is, that
device_create_managed_software_node() guarantees that the
software node (together with the properties) is removed when
the device is removed. The function device_add_property() does
not guarantee that, so the properties added with it should
always be removed with device_remove_properties().
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Previously we calculated the device's acceptable L0s and L1 exit latencies
in pcie_aspm_cap_init() and cached them in struct pcie_link_state.
These values are only used in pcie_aspm_check_latency() where they are
compared with the actual exit latencies of the link. This path is used
when removing or changing the D state of the device, so it's relatively low
frequency.
To reduce the amount of per-link data we store, remove the acceptable[]
arrays from struct pcie_link_state and calculate them directly from the
already-cached Device Capabilities register when needed.
[bhelgaas: use endpoint->devcap instead of reading it again]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211119193732.12343-4-refactormyself@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Previously we calculated the upstream and downstream L0s and L1 exit
latencies of the link in pcie_aspm_cap_init() and cached them in struct
pcie_link_state.latency_*.
These values are only used in pcie_aspm_check_latency() where they are
compared with the acceptable latencies on the link. This path is used when
removing or changing the D state of the device, so it's relatively low
frequency.
To reduce the amount of per-link data we store, remove the latency_*
entries from struct pcie_link_state and calculate the latencies directly
where they are needed.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211119193732.12343-3-refactormyself@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Saheed O. Bolarinwa <refactormyself@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
The Power Fault Detected bit in the Slot Status register differs from
all other hotplug events in that it is sticky: It can only be cleared
after turning off slot power. Per PCIe r5.0, sec. 6.7.1.8:
If a power controller detects a main power fault on the hot-plug slot,
it must automatically set its internal main power fault latch [...].
The main power fault latch is cleared when software turns off power to
the hot-plug slot.
The stickiness used to cause interrupt storms and infinite loops which
were fixed in 2009 by commits 5651c48cfa ("PCI pciehp: fix power fault
interrupt storm problem") and 99f0169c17 ("PCI: pciehp: enable
software notification on empty slots").
Unfortunately in 2020 the infinite loop issue was inadvertently
reintroduced by commit 8edf5332c3 ("PCI: pciehp: Fix MSI interrupt
race"): The hardirq handler pciehp_isr() clears the PFD bit until
pciehp's power_fault_detected flag is set. That happens in the IRQ
thread pciehp_ist(), which never learns of the event because the hardirq
handler is stuck in an infinite loop. Fix by setting the
power_fault_detected flag already in the hardirq handler.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214989
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/DM8PR11MB5702255A6A92F735D90A4446868B9@DM8PR11MB5702.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
Fixes: 8edf5332c3 ("PCI: pciehp: Fix MSI interrupt race")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/66eaeef31d4997ceea357ad93259f290ededecfd.1637187226.git.lukas@wunner.de
Reported-by: Joseph Bao <joseph.bao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joseph Bao <joseph.bao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Cc: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b12005c0d57bb9d4c8b486724d078b7bd92f8321.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Compile tested only.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/679ce049bccf10df3ca9ef4918ee2c3235afdaea.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Compile tested only.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9b0632f1f183432149f495cf12bdd5a72cc597a4.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Compile tested only.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e185b052fbfd530df703a36dd31126cb870eed95.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ed01cad87a2e35f3865275b5fb34290817a1ebf8.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>
When config pci_ops.read() can detect failed PCI transactions, the data
returned to the CPU is PCI_ERROR_RESPONSE (~0 or 0xffffffff).
Obviously a successful PCI config read may *also* return that data if a
config register happens to contain ~0, so it doesn't definitively indicate
an error unless we know the register cannot contain ~0.
Use PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() to check the response we get when we read data
from hardware. This unifies PCI error response checking and makes error
checks consistent and easier to find.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f4d18d470cb90f9cb52ea155b01528ba2e76e8d6.1637243717.git.naveennaidu479@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Naveen Naidu <naveennaidu479@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
