Based on an idea from Dave, but cleaned up a bit.
We had multiple fields for essentially the same thing.
Now bo->base.size is the original size of the BO in
arbitrary units, usually bytes.
bo->mem.num_pages is the size in number of pages in the
resource domain of bo->mem.mem_type.
v2: use the GEM object size instead of the BO size
v3: fix printks in some places
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> (v1)
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/406831/
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:51: warning: Function parameter or member 'ttm_global_mutex' not described in 'DEFINE_MUTEX'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:286: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:359: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_cleanup_refs'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:359: warning: Function parameter or member 'interruptible' not described in 'ttm_bo_cleanup_refs'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:359: warning: Function parameter or member 'no_wait_gpu' not described in 'ttm_bo_cleanup_refs'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:359: warning: Function parameter or member 'unlock_resv' not described in 'ttm_bo_cleanup_refs'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:424: warning: Function parameter or member 'bdev' not described in 'ttm_bo_delayed_delete'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:424: warning: Function parameter or member 'remove_all' not described in 'ttm_bo_delayed_delete'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:635: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:635: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:635: warning: Function parameter or member 'locked' not described in 'ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:635: warning: Function parameter or member 'busy' not described in 'ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:769: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_add_move_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:769: warning: Function parameter or member 'man' not described in 'ttm_bo_add_move_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:769: warning: Function parameter or member 'mem' not described in 'ttm_bo_add_move_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:769: warning: Function parameter or member 'no_wait_gpu' not described in 'ttm_bo_add_move_fence'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_force_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'place' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_force_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'mem' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_force_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:806: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_force_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'bo' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'placement' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'mem' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:872: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'ttm_bo_mem_space'
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c:1387: warning: Function parameter or member 'ctx' not described in 'ttm_bo_swapout'
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201116174112.1833368-32-lee.jones@linaro.org
Currently drivers get called to move a buffer, but if they have to
move it temporarily through another space (SYSTEM->VRAM via TT)
then they can end up with a lot of ttm->driver->ttm call stacks,
if the temprorary space moves requires eviction.
Instead of letting the driver do all the placement/space for the
temporary, allow it to report back (-EMULTIHOP) and a placement (hop)
to the move code, which will then do the temporary move, and the
correct placement move afterwards.
This removes a lot of code from drivers, at the expense of
adding some midlayering. I've some further ideas on how to turn
it inside out, but I think this is a good solution to the call
stack problems.
v2: separate out the driver patches, add WARN for getting
MULTHOP in paths we shouldn't (Daniel)
v3: use memset (Christian)
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: hristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201109005432.861936-2-airlied@gmail.com
When we swapout/in a BO we try to change the caching
attributes of the pages before/after doing the copy.
On x86 this is done by calling set_pages_uc(),
set_memory_wc() or set_pages_wb() for not highmem pages
to update the linear mapping of the page.
On all other platforms we do exactly nothing.
Now on x86 this is unnecessary because copy_highpage() will
either create a temporary mapping of the page which is wb
anyway and destroyed immediately again or use the linear
mapping with the correct caching attributes.
So stop this nonsense and just keep the caching as it is and
return an error when a driver tries to change the caching of
an already populated TT object.
This is much more defensive since changing caching
attributes is platform and driver specific and usually
doesn't work after the page was initially allocated.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/391293/
drm-next reverted the changes to ttm_tt_create() to do the
NULL check inside the function, but drm-misc-next adds new
users of this approach.
Re-apply the NULL check change inside the function to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/386628/
Backmerging drm-next into drm-misc-next for nouveau and panel updates.
Resolves a conflict between ttm and nouveau, where struct ttm_mem_res got
renamed to struct ttm_resource.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
