There is an interesting refcounting loop:
struct intel_memory_region has a struct ttm_resource_manager,
ttm_resource_manager->move may hold a reference to i915_request,
i915_request may hold a reference to intel_context,
intel_context may hold a reference to drm_i915_gem_object,
drm_i915_gem_object may hold a reference to intel_memory_region.
Break this loop by dropping region reference counting.
In addition, Have regions with a manager moving fence make sure
that all region objects are released before freeing the region.
v6:
- Fix a code comment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211122214554.371864-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Driver Changes:
- Prepare for local/device memory support on DG1 by starting
to use it for kernel internal allocations: context, ring
and engine scratch (Matt A, CQ, Abdiel, Imre)
- Sandybridge fix to avoid hard hang on ring resume (Chris)
- Limit imported dma-buf size to int32 (Matt A)
- Double check heartbeat timeout before resetting (Chris)
- Use new tasklet API for execution list (Emil)
- Fix SPDX checkpats warnings (Chris)
- Fixes for various checkpatch warnings (Chris)
- Selftest improvements (Chris)
- Move the defer_request waiter active assertion to correct spot (Chris)
- Make local-memory probing a GT operation (Matt, Tvrtko)
- Protect against request freeing during cancellation on wedging (Chris)
- Retire unexpected starting state error dumping (Chris)
- Distinction of memory regions in debugging (Zbigniew)
- Always flush the submission queue on checking for idle (Chris)
- Consolidate 2big error check to helper (Matt)
- Decrease number of subplatform bits (Tvrtko)
- Remove unused internal request priority levels (Chris)
- Document the unused internal header bits in buddy allocator (Matt)
- Cleanup the region class/instance encoding (Matt)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YGxksaZGXHnFxlwg@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com
Mixing I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS and I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE fared
badly. The two directives conflict, with the contiguous request setting
the min_order to the full size of the object, and the max-segment-size
setting the max_order to the limit of the DMA mapper. This results in a
situation where max_order < min_order, causing our sanity checks to
fail.
Instead of limiting the buddy block size, in the previous patch we split
the oversized buddy into multiple scatterlist elements.
Fixes: d2cf0125d4 ("drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Block sizes are only limited by the largest power-of-two that will fit
in the region size, but to construct an object we also require feeding
it into an sg list, where the upper limit of the sg entry is at most
UINT_MAX. Therefore to prevent issues with allocating blocks that are
too large, add the flag I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE which should limit
block sizes to the i915_sg_segment_size().
v2: (matt)
- query the max segment.
- prefer flag to limit block size to 4G, since it's best not to assume
the user will feed the blocks into an sg list.
- simple selftest so we don't have to guess.
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130134721.54457-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
We are incorrectly limiting the max allocation size as per the mm
max_order, which is effectively the largest power-of-two that we can fit
in the region size. However, it's normal to setup the region or
allocator with a non-power-of-two size(for example 3G), which we should
already handle correctly, except it seems for the early too-big-check.
v2: make sure we also exercise the I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS path, which
is quite different, since for that we are actually limited by the
largest power-of-two that we can fit within the region size. (Chris)
Fixes: b908be543e ("drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201021103606.241395-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 83ebef47f8)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we
have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the
strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the
engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is
simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request
construction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As drm now exports a method to create an anonymous struct file around a
drm_device for internal use, make use of it to avoid our horrible hacks.
Danial suggested that the mock_file_put() wrapper was suitable for
drm-core, along with the mock_drm_getfile() [and that the vestigal
mock_drm_file() in this patch should perhaps be the drm interface
itself]. However, the eventual goal is to remove the mock_drm_file() and
use the struct file and fput() directly, in this patch we take a simple
transition in that direction.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191107180601.30815-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The trouble with having a plain nesting flag for locks which do not
naturally nest (unlike block devices and their partitions, which is
the original motivation for nesting levels) is that lockdep will
never spot a true deadlock if you screw up.
This patch is an attempt at trying better, by highlighting a bit more
of the actual nature of the nesting that's going on. Essentially we
have two kinds of objects:
- objects without pages allocated, which cannot be on any lru and are
hence inaccessible to the shrinker.
- objects which have pages allocated, which are on an lru, and which
the shrinker can decide to throw out.
For the former type of object, memory allocations while holding
obj->mm.lock are permissible. For the latter they are not. And
get/put_pages transitions between the two types of objects.
This is still not entirely fool-proof since the rules might change.
But as long as we run such a code ever at runtime lockdep should be
able to observe the inconsistency and complain (like with any other
lockdep class that we've split up in multiple classes). But there are
a few clear benefits:
- We can drop the nesting flag parameter from
__i915_gem_object_put_pages, because that function by definition is
never going allocate memory, and calling it on an object which
doesn't have its pages allocated would be a bug.
- We strictly catch more bugs, since there's not only one place in the
entire tree which is annotated with the special class. All the
other places that had explicit lockdep nesting annotations we're now
going to leave up to lockdep again.
- Specifically this catches stuff like calling get_pages from
put_pages (which isn't really a good idea, if we can call get_pages
so could the shrinker). I've seen patches do exactly that.
Of course I fully expect CI will show me for the fool I am with this
one here :-)
v2: There can only be one (lockdep only has a cache for the first
subclass, not for deeper ones, and we don't want to make these locks
even slower). Still separate enums for better documentation.
Real fix: don't forget about phys objs and pin_map(), and fix the
shrinker to have the right annotations ... silly me.
v3: Forgot usertptr too ...
v4: Improve comment for pages_pin_count, drop the IMPORTANT comment
and instead prime lockdep (Chris).
v5: Appease checkpatch, no double empty lines (Chris)
v6: More rebasing over selftest changes. Also somehow I forgot to
push this patch :-/
Also format comments consistently while at it.
v7: Fix typo in commit message (Joonas)
Also drop the priming, with the lmem merge we now have allocations
while holding the lmem lock, which wreaks the generic priming I've
done in earlier patches. Should probably be resurrected when lmem is
fixed. See
commit 232a6ebae4
Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Date: Tue Oct 8 17:01:14 2019 +0100
drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region
I'm keeping the priming patch locally so it wont get lost.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Tang, CQ" <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v5)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v6)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105090148.30269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
[mlankhorst: Fix commit typos pointed out by Michael Ruhl]
