Rather than stealing bits from i915_sw_fence function pointer use
separate fields for function pointer and flags. If using two different
fields, the 4 byte alignment for the i915_sw_fence function pointer can
also be dropped.
v2:
(CI)
- Set new function field rather than flags in __i915_sw_fence_init
v3:
(Tvrtko)
- Remove BUG_ON(!fence->flags) in reinit as that will now blow up
- Only define fence->flags if CONFIG_DRM_I915_SW_FENCE_CHECK_DAG is
defined
v4:
- Rebase, resend for CI
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211116194929.10211-1-matthew.brost@intel.com
If the caller allows and we do not have to wait for any signals,
immediately execute the work within the caller's process. By doing so we
avoid the overhead of scheduling a new task, and the latency in
executing it, at the cost of pulling that work back into the immediate
context. (Sometimes we still prefer to offload the task to another cpu,
especially if we plan on executing many such tasks in parallel for this
client.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325120227.8044-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
