This patch makes the I915_PARAM_HAS_EXEC_CONSTANTS getparam return 0
(indicating the optional feature is not supported), and makes execbuf
always return -EINVAL if the flags are used.
Apparently, no userspace ever shipped which used this optional feature:
I checked the git history of Mesa, xf86-video-intel, libva, and Beignet,
and there were zero commits showing a use of these flags. Kernel commit
72bfa19c8d apparently introduced the feature prematurely. According
to Chris, the intention was to use this in cairo-drm, but "the use was
broken for gen6", so I don't think it ever happened.
'relative_constants_mode' has always been tracked per-device, but this
has actually been wrong ever since hardware contexts were introduced, as
the INSTPM register is saved (and automatically restored) as part of the
render ring context. The software per-device value could therefore get
out of sync with the hardware per-context value. This meant that using
them is actually unsafe: a client which tried to use them could damage
the state of other clients, causing the GPU to interpret their BO
offsets as absolute pointers, leading to bogus memory reads.
These flags were also never ported to execlist mode, making them no-ops
on Gen9+ (which requires execlists), and Gen8 in the default mode.
On Gen8+, userspace can write these registers directly, achieving the
same effect. On Gen6-7.5, it likely makes sense to extend the command
parser to support them. I don't think anyone wants this on Gen4-5.
Based on a patch by Dave Gordon.
v3: Return -ENODEV for the getparam, as this is what we do for other
obsolete features. Suggested by Chris Wilson.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92448
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170215093446.21291-1-kenneth@whitecape.org
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
A request is assigned a global seqno only when it is on the hardware
execution queue. The global seqno can be used to maintain a list of
requests on the same engine in retirement order, for example for
constructing a priority queue for waiting. Prior to its execution, or
if it is subsequently removed in the event of preemption, its global
seqno is zero. As both insertion and removal from the execution queue
may operate in IRQ context, it is not guarded by the usual struct_mutex
BKL. Instead those relying on the global seqno must be prepared for its
value to change between reads. Only when the request is complete can
the global seqno be stable (due to the memory barriers on submitting
the commands to the hardware to write the breadcrumb, if the HWS shows
that it has passed the global seqno and the global seqno is unchanged
after the read, it is indeed complete).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170223074422.4125-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Flushing the cachelines for an object is slow, can be as much as 100ms
for a large framebuffer. We currently do this under the struct_mutex BKL
on execution or on pageflip. But now with the ability to add fences to
obj->resv for both flips and execbuf (and we naturally wait on the fence
before CPU access), we can move the clflush operation to a workqueue and
signal a fence for completion, thereby doing the work asynchronously and
not blocking the driver or its clients.
v2: Introduce i915_gem_clflush.h and use a new name, split out some
extras into separate patches.
Suggested-by: Akash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170222114049.28456-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Following a reset, the context and page directory registers are lost.
However, the queue of requests that we resubmit after the reset may
depend upon them - the registers are restored from a context image, but
that restore may be inhibited and may simply be absent from the request
if it was in the middle of a sequence using the same context. If we
prime the CCID/PD registers with the first request in the queue (even
for the hung request), we prevent invalid memory access for the
following requests (and continually hung engines).
v2: Magic BIT(8), reserved for future use but still appears unused.
v3: Some commentary on handling innocent vs guilty requests
v4: Add a wait for PD_BASE fetch. The reload appears to be instant on my
Ivybridge, but this bit probably exists for a reason.
Fixes: 821ed7df6e ("drm/i915: Update reset path to fix incomplete requests")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170207152437.4252-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit c0dcb203fb)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Chris Wilson needs the new drm_driver->release callback to make sure
the shiny new dma-buf testcases don't oops the driver on unload.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
When we restart the engines, and we have active requests, a request on
the first engine may complete and queue a request to the second engine
before we try to restart the second engine. That queueing of the
request may race with the engine to restart, and so may corrupt the
current state. Disabling the engine->irq_tasklet prevents the two paths
from writing into ELSP simultaneously (and modifyin the execlists_port[]
at the same time).
Fixes: 821ed7df6e ("drm/i915: Update reset path to fix incomplete requests")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/await-hang
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170208143033.11651-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently we do a reset prepare/finish around the call to reset the GPU,
but it looks like we need a later stage after the hw has been
reinitialised to allow GEM to restart itself. Start by splitting the 2
GEM phases into 3:
prepare - before the reset, check if GEM recovered, then stop GEM
reset - after the reset, update GEM bookkeeping
finish - after the re-initialisation following the reset, restart GEM
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170208143033.11651-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The goal of the WARN was to catch when we are still actively using the
fence as we go into the runtime suspend. However, the reg->pin_count is
too coarse as it does not distinguish between exclusive ownership of the
fence register from activity.
I've not improved on the WARN, nor have we captured this WARN in an
exact igt, but it is showing up regularly in the wild:
[ 1915.935332] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10861 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2022 i915_gem_runtime_suspend+0x116/0x130 [i915]
[ 1915.935383] WARN_ON(reg->pin_count)[ 1915.935399] Modules linked in:
snd_hda_intel i915 drm_kms_helper vgem netconsole scsi_transport_iscsi fuse vfat fat x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp intel_cstate intel_uncore snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm snd_timer snd mei_me mei serio_raw intel_rapl_perf intel_pch_thermal soundcore wmi acpi_pad i2c_algo_bit syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm r8169 mii video [last unloaded: drm_kms_helper]
[ 1915.935785] CPU: 1 PID: 10861 Comm: kworker/1:0 Tainted: G U W 4.9.0-rc5+ #170
[ 1915.935799] Hardware name: LENOVO 80MX/Lenovo E31-80, BIOS DCCN34WW(V2.03) 12/01/2015
[ 1915.935822] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[ 1915.935845] ffffc900044fbbf0 ffffffffac3220bc ffffc900044fbc40 0000000000000000
[ 1915.935890] ffffc900044fbc30 ffffffffac059bcb 000007e6044fbc60 ffff8801626e3198
[ 1915.935937] ffff8801626e0000 0000000000000002 ffffffffc05e5d4e 0000000000000000
[ 1915.935985] Call Trace:
[ 1915.936013] [<ffffffffac3220bc>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x73
[ 1915.936038] [<ffffffffac059bcb>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 1915.936060] [<ffffffffac059c4f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
[ 1915.936158] [<ffffffffc052d916>] i915_gem_runtime_suspend+0x116/0x130 [i915]
[ 1915.936251] [<ffffffffc04f1c74>] intel_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x280 [i915]
[ 1915.936277] [<ffffffffac0926f1>] ? dequeue_entity+0x241/0xbc0
[ 1915.936298] [<ffffffffac36bb85>] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x55/0x180
[ 1915.936317] [<ffffffffac36bb30>] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[ 1915.936339] [<ffffffffac4514e2>] __rpm_callback+0x32/0x70
[ 1915.936356] [<ffffffffac451544>] rpm_callback+0x24/0x80
[ 1915.936375] [<ffffffffac36bb30>] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[ 1915.936392] [<ffffffffac45222d>] rpm_suspend+0x12d/0x680
[ 1915.936415] [<ffffffffac69f6d7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x17/0x30
[ 1915.936435] [<ffffffffac0810b8>] ? finish_task_switch+0x88/0x220
[ 1915.936455] [<ffffffffac4534bf>] pm_runtime_work+0x6f/0xb0
[ 1915.936477] [<ffffffffac074353>] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4d0
[ 1915.936501] [<ffffffffac074678>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
[ 1915.936523] [<ffffffffac074630>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
[ 1915.936542] [<ffffffffac074630>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
[ 1915.936559] [<ffffffffac07a2c9>] kthread+0xd9/0xf0
[ 1915.936580] [<ffffffffac07a1f0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1915.936600] [<ffffffffac69fe62>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
In the case the register is pinned, it should be present and we will
need to invalidate them to be restored upon resume as we cannot expect
the owner of the pin to call get_fence prior to use after resume.
Fixes: 7c108fd8fe ("drm/i915: Move fence cancellation to runtime suspend")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98804
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170203125717.8431-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit e0ec3ec698)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Following a reset, the context and page directory registers are lost.
However, the queue of requests that we resubmit after the reset may
depend upon them - the registers are restored from a context image, but
that restore may be inhibited and may simply be absent from the request
if it was in the middle of a sequence using the same context. If we
prime the CCID/PD registers with the first request in the queue (even
for the hung request), we prevent invalid memory access for the
following requests (and continually hung engines).
v2: Magic BIT(8), reserved for future use but still appears unused.
v3: Some commentary on handling innocent vs guilty requests
v4: Add a wait for PD_BASE fetch. The reload appears to be instant on my
Ivybridge, but this bit probably exists for a reason.
Fixes: 821ed7df6e ("drm/i915: Update reset path to fix incomplete requests")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170207152437.4252-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
The goal of the WARN was to catch when we are still actively using the
fence as we go into the runtime suspend. However, the reg->pin_count is
too coarse as it does not distinguish between exclusive ownership of the
fence register from activity.
I've not improved on the WARN, nor have we captured this WARN in an
exact igt, but it is showing up regularly in the wild:
[ 1915.935332] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 10861 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:2022 i915_gem_runtime_suspend+0x116/0x130 [i915]
[ 1915.935383] WARN_ON(reg->pin_count)[ 1915.935399] Modules linked in:
snd_hda_intel i915 drm_kms_helper vgem netconsole scsi_transport_iscsi fuse vfat fat x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp intel_cstate intel_uncore snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm snd_timer snd mei_me mei serio_raw intel_rapl_perf intel_pch_thermal soundcore wmi acpi_pad i2c_algo_bit syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm r8169 mii video [last unloaded: drm_kms_helper]
[ 1915.935785] CPU: 1 PID: 10861 Comm: kworker/1:0 Tainted: G U W 4.9.0-rc5+ #170
[ 1915.935799] Hardware name: LENOVO 80MX/Lenovo E31-80, BIOS DCCN34WW(V2.03) 12/01/2015
[ 1915.935822] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work
[ 1915.935845] ffffc900044fbbf0 ffffffffac3220bc ffffc900044fbc40 0000000000000000
[ 1915.935890] ffffc900044fbc30 ffffffffac059bcb 000007e6044fbc60 ffff8801626e3198
[ 1915.935937] ffff8801626e0000 0000000000000002 ffffffffc05e5d4e 0000000000000000
[ 1915.935985] Call Trace:
[ 1915.936013] [<ffffffffac3220bc>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x73
[ 1915.936038] [<ffffffffac059bcb>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 1915.936060] [<ffffffffac059c4f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x5f/0x80
[ 1915.936158] [<ffffffffc052d916>] i915_gem_runtime_suspend+0x116/0x130 [i915]
[ 1915.936251] [<ffffffffc04f1c74>] intel_runtime_suspend+0x64/0x280 [i915]
[ 1915.936277] [<ffffffffac0926f1>] ? dequeue_entity+0x241/0xbc0
[ 1915.936298] [<ffffffffac36bb85>] pci_pm_runtime_suspend+0x55/0x180
[ 1915.936317] [<ffffffffac36bb30>] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[ 1915.936339] [<ffffffffac4514e2>] __rpm_callback+0x32/0x70
[ 1915.936356] [<ffffffffac451544>] rpm_callback+0x24/0x80
[ 1915.936375] [<ffffffffac36bb30>] ? pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa0/0xa0
[ 1915.936392] [<ffffffffac45222d>] rpm_suspend+0x12d/0x680
[ 1915.936415] [<ffffffffac69f6d7>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x17/0x30
[ 1915.936435] [<ffffffffac0810b8>] ? finish_task_switch+0x88/0x220
[ 1915.936455] [<ffffffffac4534bf>] pm_runtime_work+0x6f/0xb0
[ 1915.936477] [<ffffffffac074353>] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4d0
[ 1915.936501] [<ffffffffac074678>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
[ 1915.936523] [<ffffffffac074630>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
[ 1915.936542] [<ffffffffac074630>] ? process_one_work+0x4d0/0x4d0
[ 1915.936559] [<ffffffffac07a2c9>] kthread+0xd9/0xf0
[ 1915.936580] [<ffffffffac07a1f0>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[ 1915.936600] [<ffffffffac69fe62>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
In the case the register is pinned, it should be present and we will
need to invalidate them to be restored upon resume as we cannot expect
the owner of the pin to call get_fence prior to use after resume.
Fixes: 7c108fd8fe ("drm/i915: Move fence cancellation to runtime suspend")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98804
Reported-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org> # v4.10-rc1+
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170203125717.8431-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
The GPU may be in an unknown state following resume and module load. The
previous occupant may have left contexts loaded, or other dangerous
state, which can cause an immediate GPU hang for us. The only save
course of action is to reset the GPU prior to using it - similarly to
how we reset the GPU prior to unload (before a second user may be
affected by our leftover state).
We need to reset the GPU very early in our load/resume sequence so that
any stale HW pointers are revoked prior to any resource allocations we
make (that may conflict).
A reset should only be a couple of milliseconds on a slow device, a cost
we should easily be able to absorb into our initialisation times.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170124110135.6418-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
