There is an interesting refcounting loop:
struct intel_memory_region has a struct ttm_resource_manager,
ttm_resource_manager->move may hold a reference to i915_request,
i915_request may hold a reference to intel_context,
intel_context may hold a reference to drm_i915_gem_object,
drm_i915_gem_object may hold a reference to intel_memory_region.
Break this loop by dropping region reference counting.
In addition, Have regions with a manager moving fence make sure
that all region objects are released before freeing the region.
v6:
- Fix a code comment.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211122214554.371864-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
An upcoming common pattern is to traverse the region object list and
perform certain actions on all objects in a region. It's a little tricky
to get the list locking right, in particular since a gem object may
change region unless it's pinned or the object lock is held.
Define a function that does this for us and that takes an argument that
defines the action to be performed on each object.
v3:
- Improve structure documentation a bit (Matthew Auld)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922062527.865433-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
For discrete, use TTM for both cached and WC system memory. That means
we currently rely on the TTM memory accounting / shrinker. For cached
system memory we should consider remaining shmem-backed, which can be
implemented from our ttm_tt_populate callback. We can then also reuse our
own very elaborate shrinker for that memory.
If an object is evicted to a gem allowable region, we will now consider
the object migrated, and we flip the gem region and move the object to a
different region list. Since we are now changing gem regions, we can't
any longer rely on the CONTIGUOUS flag being set based on the region
min page size, so remove that flag update. If we want to reintroduce it,
we need to put it in the mutable flags.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210624084240.270219-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
Driver Changes:
- Prepare for local/device memory support on DG1 by starting
to use it for kernel internal allocations: context, ring
and engine scratch (Matt A, CQ, Abdiel, Imre)
- Sandybridge fix to avoid hard hang on ring resume (Chris)
- Limit imported dma-buf size to int32 (Matt A)
- Double check heartbeat timeout before resetting (Chris)
- Use new tasklet API for execution list (Emil)
- Fix SPDX checkpats warnings (Chris)
- Fixes for various checkpatch warnings (Chris)
- Selftest improvements (Chris)
- Move the defer_request waiter active assertion to correct spot (Chris)
- Make local-memory probing a GT operation (Matt, Tvrtko)
- Protect against request freeing during cancellation on wedging (Chris)
- Retire unexpected starting state error dumping (Chris)
- Distinction of memory regions in debugging (Zbigniew)
- Always flush the submission queue on checking for idle (Chris)
- Consolidate 2big error check to helper (Matt)
- Decrease number of subplatform bits (Tvrtko)
- Remove unused internal request priority levels (Chris)
- Document the unused internal header bits in buddy allocator (Matt)
- Cleanup the region class/instance encoding (Matt)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/YGxksaZGXHnFxlwg@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com
Mixing I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS and I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE fared
badly. The two directives conflict, with the contiguous request setting
the min_order to the full size of the object, and the max-segment-size
setting the max_order to the limit of the DMA mapper. This results in a
situation where max_order < min_order, causing our sanity checks to
fail.
Instead of limiting the buddy block size, in the previous patch we split
the oversized buddy into multiple scatterlist elements.
Fixes: d2cf0125d4 ("drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Block sizes are only limited by the largest power-of-two that will fit
in the region size, but to construct an object we also require feeding
it into an sg list, where the upper limit of the sg entry is at most
UINT_MAX. Therefore to prevent issues with allocating blocks that are
too large, add the flag I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE which should limit
block sizes to the i915_sg_segment_size().
v2: (matt)
- query the max segment.
- prefer flag to limit block size to 4G, since it's best not to assume
the user will feed the blocks into an sg list.
- simple selftest so we don't have to guess.
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130134721.54457-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
