This api allow user mode to create protected buffers and to mark
contexts as making use of such objects. Only when using contexts
marked in such a way is the execution guaranteed to work as expected.
Contexts can only be marked as using protected content at creation time
(i.e. the parameter is immutable) and they must be both bannable and not
recoverable. Given that the protected session gets invalidated on
suspend, contexts created this way hold a runtime pm wakeref until
they're either destroyed or invalidated.
All protected objects and contexts will be considered invalid when the
PXP session is destroyed and all new submissions using them will be
rejected. All intel contexts within the invalidated gem contexts will be
marked banned. Userspace can detect that an invalidation has occurred via
the RESET_STATS ioctl, where we report it the same way as a ban due to a
hang.
v5: squash patches, rebase on proto_ctx, update kerneldoc
v6: rebase on obj create_ext changes
v7: Use session counter to check if an object it valid, hold wakeref in
context, don't add a new flag to RESET_STATS (Daniel)
v8: don't increase guilty count for contexts banned during pxp
invalidation (Rodrigo)
v9: better comments, avoid wakeref put race between pxp_inval and
context_close, add usage examples (Rodrigo)
v10: modify internal set/get-protected-context functions to not
return -ENODEV when setting PXP param to false or getting param
when running on pxp-unsupported hw or getting param when i915
was built with CONFIG_PXP off
Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210924191452.1539378-11-alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
Instead of hand-rolling the same three calls in each function, pull them
into an i915_gem_object_create_user helper. Apart from re-ordering of
the placements array ENOMEM check, there should be no functional change.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Add the call to i915_gem_flush_free_objects() from
i915_gem_dumb_create() in a separate patch
- Move i915_gem_object_alloc() below the simple error checks
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Add __ to i915_gem_object_create_user and kerneldoc which warns the
caller that it's not validating anything.
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-5-jason@jlekstrand.net
Since we don't allow changing the set of regions after creation, we can
make ext_set_placements() build up the region set directly in the
create_ext and assign it to the object later. This is similar to what
we did for contexts with the proto-context only simpler because there's
no funny object shuffling. This will be used in the next patch to allow
us to de-duplicate a bunch of code. Also, since we know the maximum
number of regions up-front, we can use a fixed-size temporary array for
the regions. This simplifies memory management a bit for this new
delayed approach.
v2 (Matthew Auld):
- Get rid of MAX_N_PLACEMENTS
- Drop kfree(placements) from set_placements()
v3 (Matthew Auld):
- Properly set ext_data->n_placements
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723172142.3273510-3-jason@jlekstrand.net
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
