We seem to have an unfortunate issue where we arrive from:
i915_gem_object_flush_if_display+0x86/0xd0 [i915]
intel_user_framebuffer_dirty+0x1a/0x50 [i915]
drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0xfb/0x1b0
which can be before the pages are populated(and pinned for display), and
so i915_gem_object_has_struct_page() might still return true, as per the
ttm backend. We could re-order the later get_pages() call here, but
since on discrete everything should already be coherent, with the
exception of the display engine, and even there display surfaces must be
allocated in device local-memory anyway, so there should in theory be no
conceivable reason to ever call i915_gem_clflush_object() on discrete.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4320
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027161813.3094681-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
In theory if clflush_work_create() somehow fails here, and we don't yet
have mm.pages populated then we end up resetting cache_dirty, which is
likely wrong, since that will potentially skip the flush-on-acquire, if
it was needed.
It looks like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() can arrive here before the
pages are populated.
v2(Thomas):
- Move setting cache_dirty out of the async portion, also add a
comment for why that should still be safe.
v3:
- Add Thomas' irc r-b
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027161813.3094681-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
We need the rename of reservation_object to dma_resv.
The solution on this merge came from linux-next:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix up fallout from "dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
index 03d90b49584a..4cd54c569911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ static int pool_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
struct intel_engine_pool_node *node =
container_of(ref, typeof(*node), active);
- struct reservation_object *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
+ struct dma_resv *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
int err;
- if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
+ dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_unlock(resv);
}
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(node->obj);
which is a simplified version from a previous one which had:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
flushes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816074635.26062-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
