There is clearly wrong output when mperf monitor runs in MAX_FREQ_SYSFS mode:
average frequency shows in kHz unit (despite the intended output to be in MHz),
and percentages for C state information are all wrong (including high/negative
values shown).
The problem is that the max_frequency read on initialization isn't used where it
should have been used on mperf_get_count_percent (to estimate the number of
ticks in the given time period), and the value we read from sysfs is in kHz, so
we must divide it to get the MHz value to use in current calculations.
While at it, also I fixed another small issues in the debug output of
max_frequency value in mperf_get_count_freq.
Signed-off-by: Herton R. Krzesinski <herton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In commit ae91d60ba8, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y). The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way.
The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
// <smpl>
@@ expression E1,E2; @@
(
!E1 & !E2
|
- !E1 & E2
+ !(E1 & E2)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Himangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This specific processor supports 3 new package sleep states.
Provide a monitor, so that the user can see their usage.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add Haswell model numbers to snb_register() as it also supports the
C-states introduced in SandyBridge processors.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If an MSR based monitor is run in parallel this is not needed. This is the
default case on all/most Intel machines.
But when only sysfs info is read via cpupower monitor -m Idle_Stats (typically
the case for non root users) or when other monitors are PCI based (AMD),
Idle_Stats, read from sysfs can be totally bogus:
cpupower monitor -m Idle_Stats
PKG |CORE|CPU | POLL | C1-N | C3-N | C6-N
0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.24| 99.81
0| 0| 32| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.7
...
0| 17| 20| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 173.1
0| 17| 52| 0.00| 0.00| 0.07| 173.0
0| 18| 68| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00
0| 18| 76| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00
...
With the -c option all cores are woken up and the kernel
did update cpuidle statistics before reading out sysfs.
This causes some overhead. Therefore avoid if possible, use
if needed:
cpupower monitor -c -m Idle_Stats
PKG |CORE|CPU | POLL | C1-N | C3-N | C6-N
0| 0| 0| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2
0| 0| 32| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2
...
0| 8| 8| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.82
0| 8| 40| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.81
0| 9| 24| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.3
0| 9| 56| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 100.2
0| 16| 4| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.75
0| 16| 36| 0.00| 0.00| 0.00| 99.38
...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fix minor warnings reported with GCC 4.6:
* The sysfs_write_file function is unused - remove it.
* The pr_mon_len in the print_header function is unsed - remove it.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Cox <p@lmercox.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The name of the monitor is updated at runtime to the name of the
CPU type.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
CC: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
AMD's BKDG (Bios and Kernel Developers Guide) talks in the CPU spec of their
CPU families about PCI registers defined by "device" (slot) and func(tion).
Assuming that CPU specific configuration PCI devices are always on domain
and bus zero a pci_slot_func_init() func which gets the slot and func of
the desired PCI device passed looks like the most convenient way.
This also obsoletes the PCI device id maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
CC: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Instead of printing something non-formatted to stdout, call
man(1) to show the man page for the proper subcommand.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
This allows for example:
cpupower -c 2-4,6 monitor -m Mperf
|Mperf
PKG |CORE|CPU | C0 | Cx | Freq
0| 8| 4| 2.42| 97.58| 1353
0| 16| 2| 14.38| 85.62| 1928
0| 24| 6| 1.76| 98.24| 1442
1| 16| 3| 15.53| 84.47| 1650
CPUs always get resorted for package, core then cpu id if it could get read out
(or however you name these topology levels...).
Still this is a nice way to keep the overview if a test binary is bound to
a specific CPU or if one wants to show all CPUs inside a package or similar.
Still missing: Do not measure not available cores to reduce the overhead
and achieve better results.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Before, checking for offlined CPUs was done dirty and
it was checked whether topology parsing returned -1 values.
But this is a valid case on a Xen (and possibly other) kernels.
Do proper online/offline checking, also take CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
option into account (no /sys/devices/../cpuX/online file).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Which makes the implementation independent from cpufreq drivers.
Therefore this would also work on a Xen kernel where the hypervisor
is doing frequency switching and idle entering.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
CPU power consumption vs performance tuning is no longer
limited to CPU frequency switching anymore: deep sleep states,
traditional dynamic frequency scaling and hidden turbo/boost
frequencies are tied close together and depend on each other.
The first two exist on different architectures like PPC, Itanium and
ARM, the latter (so far) only on X86. On X86 the APU (CPU+GPU) will
only run most efficiently if CPU and GPU has proper power management
in place.
Users and Developers want to have *one* tool to get an overview what
their system supports and to monitor and debug CPU power management
in detail. The tool should compile and work on as many architectures
as possible.
Once this tool stabilizes a bit, it is intended to replace the
Intel-specific tools in tools/power/x86
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
