The recent overhaul of pci_irq_get_affinity() introduced a regression when
pci_irq_get_affinity() is called for an MSI-X interrupt which was not
allocated with affinity descriptor information.
The original code just returned a NULL pointer in that case, but the rework
added a WARN_ON() under the assumption that the corresponding WARN_ON() in
the MSI case can be applied to MSI-X as well.
In fact the MSI warning in the original code does not make sense either
because it's legitimate to invoke pci_irq_get_affinity() for a MSI
interrupt which was not allocated with affinity descriptor information.
Remove it and just return NULL as the original code did.
Fixes: f482359001 ("PCI/MSI: Simplify pci_irq_get_affinity()")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87ee4n38sm.ffs@tglx
The recent cleanup of pci_irq_get_affinity() broke the function for
PCI/MSI-X and indices > 0. Only the MSI descriptor for PCI/MSI has more
than one affinity mask which can be retrieved via the MSI index.
PCI/MSI-X has one descriptor per vector and each has a single affinity
mask.
Use index 0 when accessing the affinity mask in the MSI descriptor when
MSI-X is enabled.
Fixes: f482359001 ("PCI/MSI: Simplify pci_irq_get_affinity()")
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87v8zm9pmd.ffs@tglx
To prepare for dynamic extension of MSI-X vectors, protect the MSI
operations for MSI and MSI-X. This requires to move the invocation of
irq_create_affinity_masks() out of the descriptor lock section to avoid
reverse lock ordering vs. CPU hotplug lock as some callers of the PCI/MSI
allocation interfaces already hold it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.982292705@linutronix.de
The MSI core will introduce runtime allocation of MSI related data. This
data will be devres managed and has to be set up before enabling
PCI/MSI[-X]. This would introduce an ordering issue vs. pcim_release().
The setup order is:
pcim_enable_device()
devres_alloc(pcim_release...);
...
pci_irq_alloc()
msi_setup_device_data()
devres_alloc(msi_device_data_release, ...)
and once the device is released these release functions are invoked in the
opposite order:
msi_device_data_release()
...
pcim_release()
pci_disable_msi[x]()
which is obviously wrong, because pci_disable_msi[x]() requires the MSI
data to be available to tear down the MSI[-X] interrupts.
Remove the MSI[-X] teardown from pcim_release() and add an explicit action
to be installed on the attempt of enabling PCI/MSI[-X].
This allows the MSI core data allocation to be ordered correctly in a
subsequent step.
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tuf9rdoj.ffs@tglx
There are quite some places which retrieve the first MSI descriptor to
evaluate whether the setup is for MSI or MSI-X. That's required because
pci_dev::msi[x]_enabled is only set when the setup completed successfully.
There is no real reason why msi[x]_enabled can't be set at the beginning of
the setup sequence and cleared in case of a failure.
Implement that so the MSI descriptor evaluations can be converted to simple
property queries.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.250049810@linutronix.de
