Add an usage for kernel submissions. Waiting for those are mandatory for
dynamic DMA-bufs.
As a precaution this patch also changes all occurrences where fences are
added as part of memory management in TTM, VMWGFX and i915 to use the
new value because it now becomes possible for drivers to ignore fences
with the WRITE usage.
v2: use "must" in documentation, fix whitespaces
v3: separate out some driver changes and better document why some
changes should still be part of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-5-christian.koenig@amd.com
Instead of distingting between shared and exclusive fences specify
the fence usage while adding fences.
Rework all drivers to use this interface instead and deprecate the old one.
v2: some kerneldoc comments suggested by Daniel
v3: fix a missing case in radeon
v4: rebase on nouveau changes, fix lockdep and temporary disable warning
v5: more documentation updates
v6: separate internal dma_resv changes from this patch, avoids to
disable warning temporary, rebase on upstream changes
v7: fix missed case in lima driver, minimize changes to i915_gem_busy_ioctl
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-3-christian.koenig@amd.com
We seem to have an unfortunate issue where we arrive from:
i915_gem_object_flush_if_display+0x86/0xd0 [i915]
intel_user_framebuffer_dirty+0x1a/0x50 [i915]
drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0xfb/0x1b0
which can be before the pages are populated(and pinned for display), and
so i915_gem_object_has_struct_page() might still return true, as per the
ttm backend. We could re-order the later get_pages() call here, but
since on discrete everything should already be coherent, with the
exception of the display engine, and even there display surfaces must be
allocated in device local-memory anyway, so there should in theory be no
conceivable reason to ever call i915_gem_clflush_object() on discrete.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4320
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027161813.3094681-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
In theory if clflush_work_create() somehow fails here, and we don't yet
have mm.pages populated then we end up resetting cache_dirty, which is
likely wrong, since that will potentially skip the flush-on-acquire, if
it was needed.
It looks like intel_user_framebuffer_dirty() can arrive here before the
pages are populated.
v2(Thomas):
- Move setting cache_dirty out of the async portion, also add a
comment for why that should still be safe.
v3:
- Add Thomas' irc r-b
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027161813.3094681-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
We need the rename of reservation_object to dma_resv.
The solution on this merge came from linux-next:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:48:39 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] drm: fix up fallout from "dma-buf: rename reservation_object to dma_resv"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
index 03d90b49584a..4cd54c569911 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pool.c
@@ -43,12 +43,12 @@ static int pool_active(struct i915_active *ref)
{
struct intel_engine_pool_node *node =
container_of(ref, typeof(*node), active);
- struct reservation_object *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
+ struct dma_resv *resv = node->obj->base.resv;
int err;
- if (reservation_object_trylock(resv)) {
- reservation_object_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
- reservation_object_unlock(resv);
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(resv)) {
+ dma_resv_add_excl_fence(resv, NULL);
+ dma_resv_unlock(resv);
}
err = i915_gem_object_pin_pages(node->obj);
which is a simplified version from a previous one which had:
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
flushes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816074635.26062-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
