If HTI (also sometimes called HDPORT) is enabled at startup, it may be
using some of the PHYs and DPLLs making them unavailable for general
usage. Let's read out the HDPORT_STATE register and avoid making use of
resources that HTI is already using.
v2:
- Fix minor checkpatch warnings
v3:
- Just readout HDPORT_STATE register once during init and then parse it
later as needed.
- Add a 'has_hti' device info flag to track whether we should readout
HDPORT_STATE or not. We can skip the platform/flag tests later since
the hti_state in dev_priv will remain 0 for platforms it does not
apply to.
- Move PLL masking into icl_get_combo_phy_dpll() since at the moment
RKL is the only platform that has HTI. (Jose)
Bspec: 49189
Bspec: 53707
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716220551.2730644-5-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Hours Of Battery Life is a new GEN12+ power-saving feature that allows
supported motherboards to use a special voltage swing table for eDP
panels that uses less power.
So here if supported by HW, OEM will set it in VBT and i915 will try
to train link with HOBL vswing table if link training fails it fall
back to the original table.
intel_ddi_dp_preemph_max() was optimized to only check the HOBL flag
instead of do something like is done in intel_ddi_dp_voltage_max()
because it is only called after the first entry of the voltage swing
table was loaded so the HOBL flag is valid at that point.
v3:
- removed a few parameters of icl_ddi_combo_vswing_program() that
can be taken from encoder
v4:
- using the HOBL vswing table until training fails completely (Ville)
v5:
- not reducing lane or link rate when link training fails with HOBL
active
- duplicated the HOBL voltage swing entry to match DP spec requirement
v6:
- removed the optional VS 3 & pre-emp 0 from HOBL table
- changed from u8:1 to bool to store hobl_failed/active
BSpec: 49291
BSpec: 49399
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200715175637.33763-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The value we program to DDI_BUF_CTL changes at the following places:
- At enabling/disabling the output to configure the port width etc, and
to enable/disable the DDI BUF function.
- At the beginning/end of link re-training to disable/re-enable the DDI
BUF function.
- On HSW/BDW/SKL to change the voltage swing/pre-emph levels.
Except of the above the value we program to the DDI_BUF_CTL register
(intel_dp->DP) doesn't change, so no need to reprogram the register when
changing the link training patterns (which is programmed via the
DP_TP_CTL register on DDI platforms).
v2:
- Fix the commit message wrt. voltage/pre-emph level values in
intel_dp->DP. (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200714153141.10280-2-imre.deak@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
According to BSpec this flag should not be changed while the DDI
function is enabled. On BDW+ the DP_TP_CTL register spec also states it
explicitly that the HW takes care of enabling/disabling the scrambling
for training patterns (and it must stay enabled for normal pixel
output). Assume that this HW automatic handling of scrambling is also
true for HSW.
BSpec: 8013, 7557, 50484
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200714153141.10280-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
MST encoders must use the master MST transcoder's DP_TP_STATUS and
DP_TP_CONTROL registers. Atm, during the HW readout of an MST encoder
connected to a slave transcoder we reset these register addresses in
intel_dp::regs.dp_tp_* to the slave transcoder's DP_TP_* register
addresses incorrectly; fix this.
One example where the above overwite happens is the encoder HW state
validation after enabling multiple streams; see
intel_dp_mst_enc_get_config(). After that during disabling any stream
we'll get a
'Timed out waiting for ACT sent when disabling'
error, due to reading from the incorrect DP_TP_STATUS register.
This change replaces
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/369577/?series=78193&rev=1
which just papered over the problem.
v2:
- Correct the failure scenario in the commit log. (José)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200616211146.23027-1-imre.deak@intel.com
According to BSpec the Data Island Packet should be disabled after
disabling the transcoder, but before the transcoder clock select is set
to none. On an ICL RVP, daisy-chained MST config not following this
leads to a hang with the following MCE when disabling the output:
[ 870.948739] mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 5 Bank 6: ba00000011000402
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP !INEXACT! 10:<ffffffff81aca652> {poll_idle+0x92/0xb0}
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC 135a261fe61
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:706e5 TIME 1591739604 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 20
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii'
[ 871.019212] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Processor context corrupt
[ 871.019212] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal machine check
[ 871.019212] Kernel Offset: disabled
Bspec: 4287
Fixes: fa37a21327 ("drm/i915: Stop sending DP SDPs on ddi disable")
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200609220616.6015-1-imre.deak@intel.com
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
In order to use computed config for DP SDPs (DP VSC SDP and DP HDR Metadata
Infoframe SDP), it replaces intel_dp_vsc_enable() function and
intel_dp_hdr_metadata_enable() function to intel_dp_set_infoframes()
function.
And it removes unused functions.
Before:
intel_dp_vsc_enable() and intel_dp_hdr_metadata_enable() compute sdp
configs and program sdp registers on enable callback of encoder.
After:
It separates computing of sdp configs and programming of sdp register.
The compute config callback of encoder calls computing sdp configs.
The enable callback of encoder calls programming sdp register.
v3: Rebased
v5: Polish commit message [Uma]
v10: Rebased
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-8-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com