Currently ext4_fc_track_template() checks, whether the trace event
path belongs to replay or does sb has ineligible set, if yes it simply
returns. This patch pulls those checks before calling
ext4_fc_track_template() in the callers of ext4_fc_track_template().
[ Add checks to ext4_rename() which calls the __ext4_fc_track_*()
functions directly. -- TYT ]
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3cd025d9c490218a92e6d8fb30b6123e693373e3.1647057583.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
in the follow scenario:
1. jbd start transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some actions and add inode to FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
4. jbd complete transaction n and clear FC_Q_MAIN fc_q
5. task A call fsync
Fast commit will lost the file actions during a full commit.
we should also add updates to staging queue during a full commit.
and in ext4_fc_cleanup(), when reset a inode's fc track range, check
it's i_sync_tid, if it bigger than current transaction tid, do not
rest it, or we will lost the track range.
And EXT4_MF_FC_COMMITTING is not needed anymore, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-3-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
During fast commit replay procedure, we clear inode blocks bitmap in
ext4_ext_clear_bb(), this may cause ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() allocate
blocks still in use.
Make ext4_fc_record_regions() also record physical disk regions used by
inodes during replay procedure. Then ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple() can
excludes these blocks in use.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110035141.1980-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
For now ,we use ext4_punch_hole() during fast commit replay delete range
procedure. But it will be affected by inode->i_size, which may not
correct during fast commit replay procedure. The following test will
failed.
-create & write foo (len 1000K)
-falloc FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE foo (range 400K - 600K)
-create & fsync bar
-falloc FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE foo (range 300K-500K)
-fsync foo
-crash before a full commit
After the fast_commit reply procedure, the range 400K-500K will not be
removed. Because in this case, when calling ext4_punch_hole() the
inode->i_size is 0, and it just retruns with doing nothing.
Change to use ext4_ext_remove_space() instead of ext4_punch_hole()
to remove blocks of inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223032337.5198-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Since there are no blocks in an inline data inode, there's no point in
fixing iblocks field in fast commit replay path for this inode.
Similarly, there's no point in fixing any block bitmaps / global block
counters with respect to such an inode. Just bail out from these
functions if an inline data inode is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211015182513.395917-2-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
During the commit phase in fast commits if an inode with inline data
is being committed, also commit the inline data along with
inode. Since recovery code just blindly copies entire content found in
inode TLV, there is no change needed on the recovery path. Thus, this
change is backward compatiable.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211015182513.395917-1-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now EXT4_FC_TAG_ADD_RANGE uses ext4_extent to track the
newly-added blocks, but the limit on the max value of
ee_len field is ignored, and it can lead to BUG_ON as
shown below when running command "fallocate -l 128M file"
on a fast_commit-enabled fs:
kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h:199!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 3 PID: 624 Comm: fallocate Not tainted 5.14.0-rc6+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
RIP: 0010:ext4_fc_write_inode_data+0x1f3/0x200
Call Trace:
? ext4_fc_write_inode+0xf2/0x150
ext4_fc_commit+0x93b/0xa00
? ext4_fallocate+0x1ad/0x10d0
ext4_sync_file+0x157/0x340
? ext4_sync_file+0x157/0x340
vfs_fsync_range+0x49/0x80
do_fsync+0x3d/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x14/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Simply fixing it by limiting the number of blocks
in one EXT4_FC_TAG_ADD_RANGE TLV.
Fixes: aa75f4d3da ("ext4: main fast-commit commit path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210820044505.474318-1-houtao1@huawei.com
Fast commit recovery data on disk may not be aligned. So, when the
recovery code reads it, this patch makes sure that fast commit info
found on-disk is first memcpy-ed into an aligned variable before
accessing it. As a consequence of it, we also remove some macros that
could resulted in unaligned accesses.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 8016e29f43 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210519215920.2037527-1-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using no_printk() for jbd_debug() revealed two warnings:
fs/jbd2/recovery.c: In function 'fc_do_one_pass':
fs/jbd2/recovery.c:256:30: error: format '%d' expects a matching 'int' argument [-Werror=format=]
256 | jbd_debug(3, "Processing fast commit blk with seq %d");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c: In function 'ext4_fc_replay_add_range':
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c:1732:30: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
1732 | jbd_debug(1, "Converting from %d to %d %lld",
The first one was added incorrectly, and was also missing a few newlines
in debug output, and the second one happened when the type of an
argument changed.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: d556435156 ("jbd2: avoid -Wempty-body warnings")
Fixes: 6db0746189 ("ext4: use BIT() macro for BH_** state bits")
Fixes: 5b849b5f96 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210409201211.1866633-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch adds rename whiteout support in fast commits. Note that the
whiteout object that gets created is actually char device. Which
imples, the function ext4_inode_journal_mode(struct inode *inode)
would return "JOURNAL_DATA" for this inode. This has a consequence in
fast commit code that it will make creation of the whiteout object a
fast-commit ineligible behavior and thus will fall back to full
commits. With this patch, this can be observed by running fast commits
with rename whiteout and seeing the stats generated by ext4_fc_stats
tracepoint as follows:
ext4_fc_stats: dev 254:32 fc ineligible reasons:
XATTR:0, CROSS_RENAME:0, JOURNAL_FLAG_CHANGE:0, NO_MEM:0, SWAP_BOOT:0,
RESIZE:0, RENAME_DIR:0, FALLOC_RANGE:0, INODE_JOURNAL_DATA:16;
num_commits:6, ineligible: 6, numblks: 3
So in short, this patch guarantees that in case of rename whiteout, we
fall back to full commits.
Amir mentioned that instead of creating a new whiteout object for
every rename, we can create a static whiteout object with irrelevant
nlink. That will make fast commits to not fall back to full
commit. But until this happens, this patch will ensure correctness by
falling back to full commits.
Fixes: 8016e29f43 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316221921.1124955-1-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Miscellaneous ext4 cleanups and bug fixes. Pretty boring this cycle..."
* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
ext4: add .kunitconfig fragment to enable ext4-specific tests
ext: EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS should depend on EXT4_FS instead of selecting it
ext4: reset retry counter when ext4_alloc_file_blocks() makes progress
ext4: fix potential htree index checksum corruption
ext4: factor out htree rep invariant check
ext4: Change list_for_each* to list_for_each_entry*
ext4: don't try to processed freed blocks until mballoc is initialized
ext4: use DEFINE_MUTEX() for mutex lock
Fast commit on-disk format is designed such that the replay of these
tags can be idempotent. This patch adds documentation in the code in
form of comments and in form kernel docs that describes these
characteristics. This patch also adds a TODO item needed to ensure
kernel fast commit replay idempotence.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119232822.1860882-1-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add missing __acquire() and __releases() annotations, and make
fc_ineligible_reasons[] static, as it is not used outside of
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch removes jbd2_fc_init() API and its related functions to
simplify enabling fast commits. With this change, the number of fast
commit blocks to use is solely determined by the JBD2 layer. So, we
move the default value for minimum number of fast commit blocks from
ext4/fast_commit.h to include/linux/jbd2.h. However, whether or not to
use fast commits is determined by the file system. The file system
just sets the fast commit feature using
jbd2_journal_set_features(). JBD2 layer then determines how many
blocks to use for fast commits (based on the value found in the JBD2
superblock).
Note that the JBD2 feature flag of fast commits is just an indication
that there are fast commit blocks present on disk. It doesn't tell
JBD2 layer about the intent of the file system of whether to it wants
to use fast commit or not. That's why, we blindly clear the fast
commit flag in journal_reset() after the recovery is done.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106035911.1942128-7-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Firstly, pass handle to all ext4_fc_track_* functions and use
transaction id found in handle->h_transaction->h_tid for tracking fast
commit updates. Secondly, don't pass inode to
ext4_fc_track_link/create/unlink functions. inode can be found inside
these functions as d_inode(dentry). However, rename path is an
exeception. That's because in that case, we need inode that's not same
as d_inode(dentry). To handle that, add a couple of low-level wrapper
functions that take inode and dentry as arguments.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106035911.1942128-5-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If inode gets evicted due to memory pressure, we have to remove it
from the fast commit list. However, that inode may have uncommitted
changes that fast commits will lose. So, just fall back to full
commits in this case. Also, rename the fast commit ineligiblity reason
from "EXT4_FC_REASON_MEM" to "EXT4_FC_REASON_MEM_NOMEM" for better
expression.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106035911.1942128-3-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>