Pull tty / serial driver updates from Greg KH:
"Here is the big set of tty and serial driver changes for 6.0-rc1.
It was delayed from last week as I wanted to make sure the last commit
here got some good testing in linux-next and elsewhere as it seemed to
show up only late in testing for some reason.
Nothing major here, just lots of cleanups from Jiri and Ilpo to make
the tty core cleaner (Jiri) and the rs485 code simpler to use (Ilpo).
Also included in here is the obligatory n_gsm updates from Daniel
Starke and lots of tiny driver updates and minor fixes and tweaks for
other smaller serial drivers.
All of these have been in linux-next for a while with no reported
problems"
* tag 'tty-6.0-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty: (186 commits)
tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix %lu -> %u in print statements
tty: amiserial: Fix comment typo
tty: serial: document uart_get_console()
tty: serial: serial_core, reformat kernel-doc for functions
Documentation: serial: link uart_ops properly
Documentation: serial: move GPIO kernel-doc to the functions
Documentation: serial: dedup kernel-doc for uart functions
Documentation: serial: move uart_ops documentation to the struct
dt-bindings: serial: snps-dw-apb-uart: Document Rockchip RV1126
serial: mvebu-uart: uart2 error bits clearing
tty: serial: fsl_lpuart: correct the count of break characters
serial: stm32: make info structs static to avoid sparse warnings
serial: fsl_lpuart: zero out parity bit in CS7 mode
tty: serial: qcom-geni-serial: Fix get_clk_div_rate() which otherwise could return a sub-optimal clock rate.
serial: 8250_bcm2835aux: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare()
tty: vt: initialize unicode screen buffer
serial: remove VR41XX serial driver
serial: 8250: lpc18xx: Remove redundant sanity check for RS485 flags
serial: 8250_dwlib: remove redundant sanity check for RS485 flags
dt_bindings: rs485: Correct delay values
...
A memory overlapping copy occurs when deleting a long line. This memory
overlapping copy can cause data corruption when scr_memcpyw is optimized
to memcpy because memcpy does not ensure its behavior if the destination
buffer overlaps with the source buffer. The line buffer is not always
broken, because the memcpy utilizes the hardware acceleration, whose
result is not deterministic.
Fix this problem by using replacing the scr_memcpyw with scr_memmovew.
Fixes: 81732c3b2f ("tty vt: Fix line garbage in virtual console on command line edition")
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yangxi Xiang <xyangxi5@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628093322.5688-1-xyangxi5@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614090537.15557-4-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
con_do_clear_unimap() currently decreases and increases refcount of old
dictionary in a back and forth fashion. This makes the code really hard
to follow. Decrease the refcount only if everything went well and we
really allocated a new one and decoupled from the old dictionary.
I sincerelly hope I did not make a mistake in this (ill) logic.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-33-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-30-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-29-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-28-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-27-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-26-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-25-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-24-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-23-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-22-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-21-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The function uses too vague variable names like i, j, k for iterators, p,
q, p1, p2 for pointers etc.
Rename all these, so that it is clear what is going on:
- dict: for dictionaries.
- d, r, g: for dir, row, glyph iterators -- these are unsigned now.
- dir, row: for directory and row pointers.
- glyph: for the glyph.
- and so on...
This is a lot of shuffling, but the result pays off, IMO.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-20-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The code currently does shift, OR, and AND logic directly in the code.
It is not much obvious what happens there. Therefore define four macros
for that purpose and use them in the code. We use GENMASK() so that it
is clear which bits serve what purpose:
- UNI_GLYPH: bits 0.. 5
- UNI_ROW: bits 6..10
- UNI_DIR: bits 11..31
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607104946.18710-10-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
In VT_ACTIVATE an almost identical code path has been patched
with array_index_nospec. In the VT_DISALLOCATE path, the arg is
the user input from a system call argument and lately used as a index
for vc_cons[index].d access, which can be reached through path like
vt_disallocate->vc_busy or vt_disallocate->vc_deallocate.
For consistency both code paths should have the same mitigations
applied. Also, the code style is adjusted as suggested by Jiri.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220314122921.31223-1-xiam0nd.tong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
