Commit Graph

107 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
44cc4c63a8 rtw88: add support for random mac scan
When driver uses random mac address to scan, the unicast probe response
will not be received because the addr1 is not matched. Configure port
address by requested mac address to receive probe response from AP.

To support random mac scan, we need to configure the mac address during
scan period to receive unicast prop_resp. After scan is completed,
configure the mac address back to the original one that the port used.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-25 08:08:54 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
e6fec313fa rtw88: add fast xmit support
With dynamic power save support, rtw88 is able to support fast tx
path, claim it to mac80211.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-06-25 08:08:53 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
a3b0c66c59 rtw88: more descriptions about LPS
The LPS represents Leisure Power Save. When enabled, firmware will be in
charge of turning radio off between beacons. Also firmware should turn
on the radio when beacon is coming, and the data queued should be
transmitted in TBTT period.

Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-28 14:50:46 +03:00
Stanislaw Gruszka
5b0efb4d67 rtw88: avoid circular locking between local->iflist_mtx and rtwdev->mutex
Remove circular lock dependency by using atomic version of interfaces
iterate in watch_dog_work(), hence avoid taking local->iflist_mtx
(rtw_vif_watch_dog_iter() only update some data, it can be called from
atomic context). Fixes below LOCKDEP warning:

[ 1157.219415] ======================================================
[ 1157.225772] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 1157.232150] 3.10.0-1043.el7.sgruszka1.x86_64.debug #1 Not tainted
[ 1157.238346] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 1157.244635] kworker/u4:2/14490 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1157.250194]  (&rtwdev->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc098322b>] rtw_ops_config+0x2b/0x90 [rtw88]
[ 1157.259151]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 1157.265085]  (&local->iflist_mtx){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc0b8ab7a>] ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap.part.28+0xca/0x160 [mac80211]
[ 1157.276169]
which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 1157.284488]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 1157.292101]
-> #2 (&local->iflist_mtx){+.+...}:
[ 1157.296919]        [<ffffffffbc741a29>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x1e0
[ 1157.302955]        [<ffffffffbce72793>] mutex_lock_nested+0x93/0x410
[ 1157.309416]        [<ffffffffc0b6038f>] ieee80211_iterate_interfaces+0x2f/0x60 [mac80211]
[ 1157.317730]        [<ffffffffc09811ab>] rtw_watch_dog_work+0xcb/0x130 [rtw88]
[ 1157.325003]        [<ffffffffbc6d77bc>] process_one_work+0x22c/0x720
[ 1157.331481]        [<ffffffffbc6d7dd6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x3b0
[ 1157.337589]        [<ffffffffbc6e107f>] kthread+0xef/0x100
[ 1157.343260]        [<ffffffffbce848b7>] ret_from_fork_nospec_end+0x0/0x39
[ 1157.350091]
-> #1 ((&(&rtwdev->watch_dog_work)->work)){+.+...}:
[ 1157.356314]        [<ffffffffbc741a29>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x1e0
[ 1157.362427]        [<ffffffffbc6d570b>] flush_work+0x5b/0x310
[ 1157.368287]        [<ffffffffbc6d740e>] __cancel_work_timer+0xae/0x170
[ 1157.374940]        [<ffffffffbc6d7583>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
[ 1157.381930]        [<ffffffffc0982b49>] rtw_core_stop+0x29/0x50 [rtw88]
[ 1157.388679]        [<ffffffffc098bee6>] rtw_enter_ips+0x16/0x20 [rtw88]
[ 1157.395428]        [<ffffffffc0983242>] rtw_ops_config+0x42/0x90 [rtw88]
[ 1157.402173]        [<ffffffffc0b13343>] ieee80211_hw_config+0xc3/0x680 [mac80211]
[ 1157.409854]        [<ffffffffc0b3925b>] ieee80211_do_open+0x69b/0x9c0 [mac80211]
[ 1157.417418]        [<ffffffffc0b395e9>] ieee80211_open+0x69/0x70 [mac80211]
[ 1157.424496]        [<ffffffffbcd03442>] __dev_open+0xe2/0x160
[ 1157.430356]        [<ffffffffbcd03773>] __dev_change_flags+0xa3/0x180
[ 1157.436922]        [<ffffffffbcd03879>] dev_change_flags+0x29/0x60
[ 1157.443224]        [<ffffffffbcda14c4>] devinet_ioctl+0x794/0x890
[ 1157.449331]        [<ffffffffbcda27b5>] inet_ioctl+0x75/0xa0
[ 1157.455087]        [<ffffffffbccd54eb>] sock_do_ioctl+0x2b/0x60
[ 1157.461178]        [<ffffffffbccd5753>] sock_ioctl+0x233/0x310
[ 1157.467109]        [<ffffffffbc8bd820>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x410/0x6c0
[ 1157.473233]        [<ffffffffbc8bdb71>] SyS_ioctl+0xa1/0xc0
[ 1157.478914]        [<ffffffffbce84a5e>] system_call_fastpath+0x25/0x2a
[ 1157.485569]
-> #0 (&rtwdev->mutex){+.+.+.}:
[ 1157.490022]        [<ffffffffbc7409d1>] __lock_acquire+0xec1/0x1630
[ 1157.496305]        [<ffffffffbc741a29>] lock_acquire+0x99/0x1e0
[ 1157.502413]        [<ffffffffbce72793>] mutex_lock_nested+0x93/0x410
[ 1157.508890]        [<ffffffffc098322b>] rtw_ops_config+0x2b/0x90 [rtw88]
[ 1157.515724]        [<ffffffffc0b13343>] ieee80211_hw_config+0xc3/0x680 [mac80211]
[ 1157.523370]        [<ffffffffc0b8a4ca>] ieee80211_recalc_ps.part.27+0x9a/0x180 [mac80211]
[ 1157.531685]        [<ffffffffc0b8abc5>] ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap.part.28+0x115/0x160 [mac80211]
[ 1157.540353]        [<ffffffffc0b8b40d>] ieee80211_beacon_connection_loss_work+0x4d/0x80 [mac80211]
[ 1157.549513]        [<ffffffffbc6d77bc>] process_one_work+0x22c/0x720
[ 1157.555886]        [<ffffffffbc6d7dd6>] worker_thread+0x126/0x3b0
[ 1157.562170]        [<ffffffffbc6e107f>] kthread+0xef/0x100
[ 1157.567765]        [<ffffffffbce848b7>] ret_from_fork_nospec_end+0x0/0x39
[ 1157.574579]
other info that might help us debug this:

[ 1157.582788] Chain exists of:
  &rtwdev->mutex --> (&(&rtwdev->watch_dog_work)->work) --> &local->iflist_mtx

[ 1157.593024]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1157.599046]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1157.603653]        ----                    ----
[ 1157.608258]   lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
[ 1157.612180]                                lock((&(&rtwdev->watch_dog_work)->work));
[ 1157.620074]                                lock(&local->iflist_mtx);
[ 1157.626555]   lock(&rtwdev->mutex);
[ 1157.630124]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 1157.636148] 4 locks held by kworker/u4:2/14490:
[ 1157.640755]  #0:  (%s#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffbc6d774a>] process_one_work+0x1ba/0x720
[ 1157.648965]  #1:  ((&ifmgd->beacon_connection_loss_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffbc6d774a>] process_one_work+0x1ba/0x720
[ 1157.659950]  #2:  (&wdev->mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffc0b8aad5>] ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap.part.28+0x25/0x160 [mac80211]
[ 1157.670901]  #3:  (&local->iflist_mtx){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffc0b8ab7a>] ieee80211_mgd_probe_ap.part.28+0xca/0x160 [mac80211]
[ 1157.682466]

Fixes: e3037485c6 ("rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver")
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-28 14:40:41 +03:00
Nathan Chancellor
237b47efcd rtw88: Make RA_MASK macros ULL
Clang warns about the definitions of these macros (full warnings trimmed
for brevity):

drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c:524:15: warning: signed shift
result (0x3FF00000000) requires 43 bits to represent, but 'int' only has
32 bits [-Wshift-overflow]
                        ra_mask &= RA_MASK_VHT_RATES | RA_MASK_OFDM_IN_VHT;
                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/main.c:527:15: warning: signed shift
result (0xFF0000000) requires 37 bits to represent, but 'int' only has
32 bits [-Wshift-overflow]
                        ra_mask &= RA_MASK_HT_RATES | RA_MASK_OFDM_IN_HT_5G;
                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Given that these are all used with ra_mask, which is of type u64, we can
just declare the macros to be ULL as well.

Fixes: e3037485c6 ("rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/467
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-02 19:26:39 +03:00
Colin Ian King
b85bd9a14c rtw88: fix shift of more than 32 bits of a integer
Currently the shift of an integer value more than 32 bits can
occur when nss is more than 32.  Fix this by making the integer
constants unsigned long longs before shifting and bit-wise or'ing
with the u64 ra_mask to avoid the undefined shift behaviour.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Bad shift operation")
Fixes: e3037485c6 ("rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-05-02 17:58:15 +03:00
Yan-Hsuan Chuang
e3037485c6 rtw88: new Realtek 802.11ac driver
This is a new mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips.
rtw88 now supports RTL8822BE/RTL8822CE now, with basic station mode
functionalities. The firmware for both can be found at linux-firmware.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
For RTL8822BE: rtw88/rtw8822b_fw.bin
For RTL8822CE: rtw88/rtw8822c_fw.bin

And for now, only PCI buses (RTL8xxxE) are supported. We will add support
for USB and SDIO in the future. The bus interface abstraction can be seen
in this driver such as hci.h. Most of the hardware setting are the same
except for some TRX path or probing setup should be separated.

Supported:

 * Basic STA/AP/ADHOC mode, and TDLS (STA is well tested)

Missing feature:

 * WOW/PNO
 * USB & SDIO bus (such as RTL8xxxU/RTL8xxxS)
 * BT coexistence (8822B/8822C are combo ICs)
 * Multiple interfaces (for now single STA is better supported)
 * Dynamic hardware calibrations (to improve/stabilize performance)

Potential problems:

 * static calibration spends too much time, and it is painful for
   driver to leave IDLE state. And slows down associate process.
   But reload function are under development, will be added soon!
 * TRX statictics misleading, as we are not reporting status correctly,
   or say, not reporting for "every" packet.

The next patch set should have BT coexistence code since RTL8822B/C are
combo ICs, and the driver for BT can be found after Linux Kernel v4.20.
So it is better to add it first to make WiFi + BT work concurrently.

Although now rtw88 is simple but we are developing more features for it.
Even we want to add support for more chips such as RTL8821C/RTL8814B.

Finally, rtw88 has many authors, listed alphabetically:

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>

Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
2019-04-30 19:43:37 +03:00