Recent versions of dt-schema warn about a previously undetected
undocumented property:
arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: mmc@20008000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('card-detect-delay' was unexpected)
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/cdns,sdhci.yaml
There are no GPIOs connected to MSSIO6B4 pin K3 so adding the common
cd-debounce-delay-ms property makes no sense. The Cadence IP has a
register that sets the card detect delay as "DP * tclk". On MPFS, this
clock frequency is not configurable (it must be 200 MHz) & the FPGA
comes out of reset with this register already set.
Fixes: bc47b2217f ("riscv: dts: microchip: add the sundance polarberry")
Fixes: 0fa6107eca ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Recent versions of dt-schema warn about a previously undetected
undocument property on the icicle & polarberry devicetrees:
arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb: ethernet@20112000: ethernet-phy@8: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('ti,fifo-depth' was unexpected)
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml
I know what you're thinking, the binding doesn't look to be the problem
and I agree. I am not sure why a TI vendor property was ever actually
added since it has no meaning... just get rid of it.
Fixes: bc47b2217f ("riscv: dts: microchip: add the sundance polarberry")
Fixes: 0fa6107eca ("RISC-V: Initial DTS for Microchip ICICLE board")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Currently mpfs-fabric.dtsi is included by mpfs.dtsi - which is fine
currently since there is only one board with this SoC upstream.
However if another board was added, it would include the fabric contents
of the Icicle Kit's reference design. To avoid this, rename
mpfs-fabric.dtsi to mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi & include it in the dts
rather than mpfs.dtsi.
mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi specifically matches the 22.03 reference
design for the icicle kit's FPGA fabric & an older version of the
design may not have the i2c or pwm devices - so add the compatible
string to document this.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220509142610.128590-6-conor.dooley@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
