The intel,sysmgr-syscon in EDAC/memory controller node is not a
recognized and documented property, so drop it to fix error:
sdr_edac@f87f8000: 'intel,sysmgr-syscon' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Align also the node name with Devicetree specification (generic, not
specific, and EDAC is purely Linux term).
Fixes: ef82c9be84 ("arm64: dts: n5x: add sdr edac support")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220318121044.108750-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com'
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The N5X platform has the Synopsys DDR controller the includes an EDAC
controller. Add the entry for the controller in the DTS file instead of
the base Agilex DTSI because the base Agilex does not have the
controller.
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
The Intel SoCFPGA N5X SoC Development Kit is a board with
Agilex, so it needs its own compatible.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Using full paths to extend or override a device tree node is error
prone. If there was a typo error, a new node will be created instead of
extending the existing node. This will lead to run-time errors that
could be hard to detect.
A mistyped label on the other hand, will cause a dtc compile error
(during build time).
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
The Intel eASIC N5X platform shares the same register map as the Agilex
platform, thus, we can re-use the socfpga_agilex.dtsi as the base
DTSI.
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
