The expression '(1 << 32)' happens to evaluate as 0 on ARM, but
it evaluates as 1 on xtensa and x86_64. This zeros sched_clock_mask,
and breaks sched_clock().
Set the type of 1 to 'unsigned long long' to get the value we need.
Reported-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
There is a small race between when the cycle count is read from
the hardware and when the epoch stabilizes. Consider this
scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
cyc = read_sched_clock()
cyc_to_sched_clock()
update_sched_clock()
...
cd.epoch_cyc = cyc;
epoch_cyc = cd.epoch_cyc;
...
epoch_ns + cyc_to_ns((cyc - epoch_cyc)
The cyc on cpu0 was read before the epoch changed. But we
calculate the nanoseconds based on the new epoch by subtracting
the new epoch from the old cycle count. Since epoch is most likely
larger than the old cycle count we calculate a large number that
will be converted to nanoseconds and added to epoch_ns, causing
time to jump forward too much.
Fix this problem by reading the hardware after the epoch has
stabilized.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Nothing about the sched_clock implementation in the ARM port is
specific to the architecture. Generalize the code so that other
architectures can use it by selecting GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
[jstultz: Merge minor collisions with other patches in my tree]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
