With a relatively recent clang master branch test_map skips a section,
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(5) .rodata.str1.1
the cause is some pointless strings from bpf_printks in the BPF program
loaded during testing. After just removing the prints to fix above error
Daniel points out the program is a bit pointless and could be simply the
empty program returning SK_PASS.
Here we do just that and return simply SK_PASS. This program is used with
test_maps selftests to test insert/remove of a program into the sockmap
and sockhash maps. Its not testing actual functionality of the TCP
sockmap programs, these are tested from test_sockmap. So we shouldn't
lose in test coverage and fix above warnings. This original test was
added before test_sockmap existed and has been copied around ever since,
clean it up now.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/161731595664.74613.1603087410166945302.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370
This patch adds a few kernel function bpf_kfunc_call_test*() for the
selftest's test_run purpose. They will be allowed for tc_cls prog.
The selftest calling the kernel function bpf_kfunc_call_test*()
is also added in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210325015252.1551395-1-kafai@fb.com
This patch removes the bpf implementation of tcp_slow_start()
and tcp_cong_avoid_ai(). Instead, it directly uses the kernel
implementation.
It also replaces the bpf_cubic_undo_cwnd implementation by directly
calling tcp_reno_undo_cwnd(). bpf_dctcp also directly calls
tcp_reno_cong_avoid() instead.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210325015246.1551062-1-kafai@fb.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-03-24
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 37 non-merge commits during the last 15 day(s) which contain
a total of 65 files changed, 3200 insertions(+), 738 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Static linking of multiple BPF ELF files, from Andrii.
2) Move drop error path to devmap for XDP_REDIRECT, from Lorenzo.
3) Spelling fixes from various folks.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Bpftool used to issue forward declarations for a struct used as part of
a pointer to array, which is invalid. Add a test to check that the
struct is fully defined in this case:
@@ -134,9 +134,9 @@
};
};
-struct struct_in_array {};
+struct struct_in_array;
-struct struct_in_array_typed {};
+struct struct_in_array_typed;
typedef struct struct_in_array_typed struct_in_array_t[2];
@@ -189,3 +189,7 @@
struct struct_with_embedded_stuff _14;
};
+struct struct_in_array {};
+
+struct struct_in_array_typed {};
+
...
#13/1 btf_dump: syntax:FAIL
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210319112554.794552-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org
Add Makefile infra to specify multi-file BPF object files (and derivative
skeletons). Add first selftest validating BPF static linker can merge together
successfully two independent BPF object files and resulting object and
skeleton are correct and usable.
Use the same F(F(F(X))) = F(F(X)) identity test on linked object files as for
the case of single BPF object files.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210318194036.3521577-13-andrii@kernel.org
When fixing the bpf test_tunnel.sh geneve failure. I only fixed the IPv4
part but forgot the IPv6 issue. Similar with the IPv4 fixes 557c223b64
("selftests/bpf: No need to drop the packet when there is no geneve opt"),
when there is no tunnel option and bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt() returns error,
there is no need to drop the packets and break all geneve rx traffic.
Just set opt_class to 0 and keep returning TC_ACT_OK at the end.
Fixes: 557c223b64 ("selftests/bpf: No need to drop the packet when there is no geneve opt")
Fixes: 933a741e3b ("selftests/bpf: bpf tunnel test.")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210309032214.2112438-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-03-09
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 90 non-merge commits during the last 17 day(s) which contain
a total of 114 files changed, 5158 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Faster bpf_redirect_map(), from Björn.
2) skmsg cleanup, from Cong.
3) Support for floating point types in BTF, from Ilya.
4) Documentation for sys_bpf commands, from Joe.
5) Support for sk_lookup in bpf_prog_test_run, form Lorenz.
6) Enable task local storage for tracing programs, from Song.
7) bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper, from Yonghong.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add missing return type to BPF_KPROBE definition. Without it, compiler
generates the following warning:
progs/loop6.c:68:12: warning: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]
BPF_KPROBE(trace_virtqueue_add_sgs, void *unused, struct scatterlist **sgs,
^
1 warning generated.
Fixes: 86a35af628 ("selftests/bpf: Add a verifier scale test with unknown bounded loop")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210309044322.3487636-1-andrii@kernel.org
Convert the selftests for sk_lookup narrow context access to use
PROG_TEST_RUN instead of creating actual sockets. This ensures that
ctx is populated correctly when using PROG_TEST_RUN.
Assert concrete values since we now control remote_ip and remote_port.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-4-lmb@cloudflare.com
The original bcc pull request https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/3270 exposed
a verifier failure with Clang 12/13 while Clang 4 works fine.
Further investigation exposed two issues:
Issue 1: LLVM may generate code which uses less refined value. The issue is
fixed in LLVM patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97479
Issue 2: Spills with initial value 0 are marked as precise which makes later
state pruning less effective. This is my rough initial analysis and
further investigation is needed to find how to improve verifier
pruning in such cases.
With the above LLVM patch, for the new loop6.c test, which has smaller loop
bound compared to original test, I got:
$ test_progs -s -n 10/16
...
stack depth 64
processed 390735 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 87
total_states 8658 peak_states 964 mark_read 6
#10/16 loop6.o:OK
Use the original loop bound, i.e., commenting out "#define WORKAROUND", I got:
$ test_progs -s -n 10/16
...
BPF program is too large. Processed 1000001 insn
stack depth 64
processed 1000001 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 91
total_states 23176 peak_states 5069 mark_read 6
...
#10/16 loop6.o:FAIL
The purpose of this patch is to provide a regression test for the above LLVM fix
and also provide a test case for further analyzing the verifier pruning issue.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Zhenwei Pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226223810.236472-1-yhs@fb.com
A test is added for arraymap and percpu arraymap. The test also
exercises the early return for the helper which does not
traverse all elements.
$ ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 hash_map:OK
#45/2 array_map:OK
#45 for_each:OK
Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226204934.3885756-1-yhs@fb.com
A test case is added for hashmap and percpu hashmap. The test
also exercises nested bpf_for_each_map_elem() calls like
bpf_prog:
bpf_for_each_map_elem(func1)
func1:
bpf_for_each_map_elem(func2)
func2:
$ ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 hash_map:OK
#45 for_each:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226204933.3885657-1-yhs@fb.com
Task local storage is enabled for tracing programs. Add two tests for
task local storage without CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
The first test stores a value in sys_enter and read it back in sys_exit.
The second test checks whether the kernel allows allocating task local
storage in exit_creds() (which it should not).
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210225234319.336131-4-songliubraving@fb.com
In bpf geneve tunnel test we set geneve option on tx side. On rx side we
only call bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt(). Since commit 9c2e14b481 ("ip_tunnels:
Set tunnel option flag when tunnel metadata is present") geneve_rx() will
not add TUNNEL_GENEVE_OPT flag if there is no geneve option, which cause
bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt() return ENOENT and _geneve_get_tunnel() in
test_tunnel_kern.c drop the packet.
As it should be valid that bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt() return error when
there is not tunnel option, there is no need to drop the packet and
break all geneve rx traffic. Just set opt_class to 0 in this test and
keep returning TC_ACT_OK.
Fixes: 933a741e3b ("selftests/bpf: bpf tunnel test.")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210224081403.1425474-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com
Add an explicit 'const void *' cast to pass program ctx pointer type into
a global function that expects pointer to structure.
warning: incompatible pointer types
passing 'struct __sk_buff *' to parameter of type 'const struct S *'
[-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
return foo(skb);
^~~
progs/test_global_func11.c:10:36: note: passing argument to parameter 's' here
__noinline int foo(const struct S *s)
^
Fixes: 8b08807d03 ("selftests/bpf: Add unit tests for pointers in global functions")
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210223082211.302596-1-me@ubique.spb.ru
test_global_func9 - check valid pointer's scenarios
test_global_func10 - check that a smaller type cannot be passed as a
larger one
test_global_func11 - check that CTX pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func12 - check access to a null pointer
test_global_func13 - check access to an arbitrary pointer value
test_global_func14 - check that an opaque pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func15 - check that a variable has an unknown value after
it was passed to a global function by pointer
test_global_func16 - check access to uninitialized stack memory
test_global_func_args - check read and write operations through a pointer
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212205642.620788-5-me@ubique.spb.ru
This builds up on the existing socket cookie test which checks whether
the bpf_get_socket_cookie helpers provide the same value in
cgroup/connect6 and sockops programs for a socket created by the
userspace part of the test.
Instead of having an update_cookie sockops program tag a socket local
storage with 0xFF, this uses both an update_cookie_sockops program and
an update_cookie_tracing program which succesively tag the socket with
0x0F and then 0xF0.
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-5-revest@chromium.org
When migrating from the bpf.h's to the vmlinux.h's definition of struct
bps_sock, an interesting LLVM behavior happened. LLVM started producing
two fetches of ctx->sk in the sockops program this means that the
verifier could not keep track of the NULL-check on ctx->sk. Therefore,
we need to extract ctx->sk in a variable before checking and
dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-4-revest@chromium.org
Currently, the selftest for the BPF socket_cookie helpers is built and
run independently from test_progs. It's easy to forget and hard to
maintain.
This patch moves the socket cookies test into prog_tests/ and vastly
simplifies its logic by:
- rewriting the loading code with BPF skeletons
- rewriting the server/client code with network helpers
- rewriting the cgroup code with test__join_cgroup
- rewriting the error handling code with CHECKs
Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210210111406.785541-3-revest@chromium.org
When BPF_FETCH is set, atomic instructions load a value from memory
into a register. The current verifier code first checks via
check_mem_access whether we can access the memory, and then checks
via check_reg_arg whether we can write into the register.
For loads, check_reg_arg has the side-effect of marking the
register's value as unkonwn, and check_mem_access has the side effect
of propagating bounds from memory to the register. This currently only
takes effect for stack memory.
Therefore with the current order, bounds information is thrown away,
but by simply reversing the order of check_reg_arg
vs. check_mem_access, we can instead propagate bounds smartly.
A simple test is added with an infinite loop that can only be proved
unreachable if this propagation is present. This is implemented both
with C and directly in test_verifier using assembly.
Suggested-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210202135002.4024825-1-jackmanb@google.com
Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on a locked socket.
Note that we could remove the switch for prog->expected_attach_type altogether
since all current sock_addr attach types are covered. However, it makes sense
to keep it as a safe-guard in case new sock_addr attach types are added that
might not operate on a locked socket. Therefore, avoid to let this slip through.
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210127232853.3753823-5-sdf@google.com
