Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chris Wilson
6804da20bb drm/i915/selftests: Select a random engine for testing memory regions
Use any blitter engine at random for prefilling the memory region.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191027225808.19437-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-28 11:57:17 +00:00
Matthew Auld
340be48f2c drm/i915/selftests: add write-dword test for LMEM
Simple test writing to dwords across an object, using various engines in
a randomized order, checking that our writes land from the cpu.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-25 22:55:49 +01:00
Abdiel Janulgue
01377a0d7e drm/i915/lmem: support kernel mapping
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.

Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-25 22:55:43 +01:00
Matthew Auld
b908be543e drm/i915: support creating LMEM objects
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-25 22:55:31 +01:00
Chris Wilson
280bc0cecb drm/i915/selftests: Fixup naked 64b divide
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_memory_region.o: in function `igt_mock_contiguous':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c:166: undefined reference to `__umoddi3'

v2: promote target to u64 for consistency across all builds

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: 2f0b97ca02 ("drm/i915/region: support contiguous allocations")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191013114509.3405-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-14 09:26:07 +01:00
Matthew Auld
2f0b97ca02 drm/i915/region: support contiguous allocations
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous
block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem
to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel
API...so perhaps something to be improved.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-08 20:50:01 +01:00
Matthew Auld
232a6ebae4 drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow
creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal
here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on
we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen,
shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want
use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
2019-10-08 20:49:55 +01:00