For a RAID1 device using a file-based bitmap, if a bitmap write error
occurs but the later writes succeed, it's possible both BITMAP_STALE
and BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR bits will be written to the bitmap super block,
the BITMAP_STALE bit will be handled properly and be cleared, but the
BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR bit in sb->flags will make bitmap_create() to fail.
So clear it to protect against the write failure-and-then-recovery case.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Having both a bitmap and a journal is pointless.
Attempting to do so can corrupt the bitmap if the journal
replay happens before the bitmap is initialized.
Rather than try to avoid this corruption, simply
refuse to allow arrays with both a bitmap and a journal.
So:
- if raid5_run sees both are present, fail.
- if adding a bitmap finds a journal is present, fail
- if adding a journal finds a bitmap is present, fail.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (4.10+)
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Tested-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Acked-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Motivated by the desire to illiminate the imprecise nature of
DM-specific patches being unnecessarily sent to both the MD maintainer
and mailing-list. Which is born out of the fact that DM files also
reside in drivers/md/
Now all MD-specific files in drivers/md/ start with either "raid" or
"md-" and the MAINTAINERS file has been updated accordingly.
Shaohua: don't change module name
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
