The TCC_DISABLE registers were not included in the 10.3 headers and
instead just placed directly in the gfx_v10_0.c source. This patch
adds them to the headers so tools like umr can scan them and support them.
Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stdenis@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
current function mixes CSDMA_DOORBELL_RANGE and SDMA0_DOORBELL_RANGE
range/size manipulation, while these 2 registers have difference size
field mask. Remove range/size manipulation for SDMA0_DOORBELL_RANGE.
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
V1:
The psp_cmd_submit_buf function is called by psp_hw_fini to send
TA unload messages to psp to terminate ras, asd and tmr. But when
amdgpu is uninstalled, drm_dev_unplug is called earlier than
psp_hw_fini in amdgpu_pci_remove, the calling order as follows:
static void amdgpu_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) {
drm_dev_unplug
......
amdgpu_driver_unload_kms->amdgpu_device_fini_hw->...
->.hw_fini->psp_hw_fini->...
->psp_ta_unload->psp_cmd_submit_buf
......
}
The program will return when calling drm_dev_enter in psp_cmd_submit_buf.
So the call to drm_dev_enter in psp_cmd_submit_buf should be
removed, so that the TA unload messages can be sent to the psp
when amdgpu is uninstalled.
V2:
1. Restore psp_cmd_submit_buf to its original code.
2. Move drm_dev_unplug call after amdgpu_driver_unload_kms in
amdgpu_pci_remove.
3. Since amdgpu_device_fini_hw is called by amdgpu_driver_unload_kms,
remove the unplug check to release device mmio resource in
amdgpu_device_fini_hw before calling drm_dev_unplug.
Signed-off-by: YiPeng Chai <YiPeng.Chai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Address the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3508:9: warning: this ‘if’ clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
3508 | if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
| ^~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3510:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘if’
3510 | if (update_type != UPDATE_TYPE_FAST)
| ^~
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamza.mahfooz@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Previously since vcn0/vcn1 are not enabled, loading firmware
is skipped. Now add firmware loading back since vcn0/vcn1
has already been enabled on sriov
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jane Jian <Jane.Jian@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
VF do not need to handle SMU IRQ state.
L1 Policy will block VF access THM_THERMAL_INT_CTRL and MP1_SMN_IH_SW_INT/CNTL.
[How]
Skip smu_v13 init register_irq_handler under SRIOV VF.
And add irq_src check in enable/disable thermal alert
to avoid thermal alert enable/disable fail.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
There is no CG(Clock Gating)/PG(Power Gating) requirement on SRIOV VF.
For multi VF, VF should not enable any CG/PG features.
For one VF, PF will program CG/PG related registers.
[How]
Do not set any cg/pg flag bit at early init under sriov.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
KIQ register init requires GRBM_GFX_CNTL to select KIQ.
[How]
As RLCG accessing registers will save the data of GRBM_GFX_CNTL and restore it.
Use RLCG indirect accessing register method to select grbm instead of mmio directly access.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
As VF cannot read MMMC_VM_FB_OFFSET with L1 Policy(read 0xffffffff).
It leads to driver get the incorrect vram base offset.
[How]
Since SR-IOV is dGPU only, skip reading this register and set the
fb_offest to 0.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
vm_l2_bank_select_reserved_cid2 is a PF_only register
that cannot be programmed by VF. This feature is only
support HDP using GPUVM page tables to access FB memory
which should be disabled on SRIOV.
[How]
Disable the feature on VF.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zha <Yifan.Zha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SRIOV needs to initialize mmsch instead of multimedia engines
directly. So currently remove them for SR-IOV until the code and
firmwares are ready.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
SR-IOV may need to load different firmwares for different ASIC inside
VF.
So create a new function in amdgpu_virt to check whether FW load needs
to be skipped.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Under SR-IOV, if VF is switched out then its doorbell will be disabled,
SDMA rely on WPTR_POLL to get doorbells which was sent during VF
switched-out time.
[How]
For SR-IOV, set SDMA WPTR_POLL_ENABLE to 1.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Under SR-IOV, we are not sure whether pipe status is
good or not when doing initialization. The compute engine
maybe fail to bringup if pipe status is bad.
[How]
Do an RS64 pipe reset for MEC before we do initialization.
Also apply to bare-metal.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
under SR-IOV, the nbio doorbell range will be defined by PF. So VF
nbio doorbell range registers will be blocked. It will cause violation
if VF access those registers directly.
[How]
create an nbio_v4_3_sriov_funcs for sriov nbio_v4_3 initialization to
skip the setting for the doorbell range registers.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Horace Chen <horace.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
there is only one SDMA engine in SDMA 6.0.1, the sdma_hqd_mask has to be
zeroed for the 2nd engine, otherwise MES scheduler will consider 2nd
engine exists and map/unmap SDMA queues to the non-existent engine.
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Huang <Tim.Huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
All gc v11_0_3 registers in gcvml2 range have different
register offset from the ones in gc v11_0_0. v11_0_3
imu_rlc_ram programming has to be separated from v11_0_0
implementation
v2: fix checkpatch errors (Alex)
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Wang <KevinYang.Wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Min <Frank.Min@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Not all the gfx10 variants need to integrate
global tap_delay and per se tap_delay firmwares
Only init tap_delay ucode when it does include in
rlc ucode binary so driver doesn't send a null buffer
to psp for firmware loading
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jack Gui <Jack.Gui@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
