[Why]
It's reasonable that we receive NAK while doing DP_REMOTE_DPCD_READ.
Downstream device might reply NAK with the reason and source should
react accordingly.
e.g.
1. When downstream device can't handle corresponding message in time,
it then replies NAK as reason been set as DEFER.
2. When multi-function branch-sink device doesn't enumerate virtual
DP peer devices for those multi-function down facing ports. Without
virtual DPCD, branch device might reply NAK with reason as BAD_PARAM
indicating this port can't do aux DPCD read.
It's expected result. Not an error.
[How]
Use drm_dbg_kms() to replace drm_err() when receive NAK.
Changes since v1:
* drm_dp_mst_topology.c file path changed. Folder was rename from
'dp' to 'display'
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
[fixed some indenting issues]
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220428124944.1683680-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
Rename dp/ to display/ to account for additional display-related
helpers, such as HDMI. Update all related include statements. No
functional changes.
Various drivers, such as i915 and amdgpu, use similar naming scheme
by putting code for video-output standards into a local display/
directory. The new directory's name is aligned with this convention.
v2:
* update commit message (Javier)
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220421073108.19226-3-tzimmermann@suse.de
