Some HDA pin widgets may be disabled by BIOS, and unavailable from a
SOR. Our SOR allocation policy uses this information to allocate an
appropriate SOR when HDA is supported by a display.
Thank you to NVIDIA for providing the information to determine this.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This makes use of all the additional routing and state added in previous
commits, making it possible to deal with GM20x macro link routing, while
also sharing code between the NV50 and GF119 implementations.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These exist to give NVKM information on the set of display paths that
the DD needs to be active at any given time.
Previously, the supervisor attempted to determine this solely from OR
state, but there's a few configurations where this information on its
own isn't enough to determine the specific display paths in question:
- ANX9805, where the PIOR protocol for both DP and TMDS is TMDS.
- On a device using DCB Switched Outputs.
- On GM20x and newer, with a crossbar between the SOR and macro links.
After this commit, the DD tells NVKM *exactly* which display path it's
attempting a modeset on.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
All of the necessary hw-specific logic is now handled at the output
resource level, so all of this can go away.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Also removes the user-facing methods to these controls, as they're not
currently utilised by the DD anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In order to properly support the SOR -> SOR + pad macro separation
that occurred with GM20x GPUs, we need to separate OR handling out
of the output path code.
This will be used as the base to support ORs (DAC, SOR, PIOR).
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Upcoming changes to split OR from output path drastically change the
placement of various operations.
In order to make the real changes clearer, do the moving around part
ahead of time.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
