The TE_P2P_DEVICE_DISCOVERABLE time event type used for ROC is
assigned low priority in the FW, and thus has low chance of
being scheduled when there are active BSS or GO VMACs (even if
fragmentation is allowed). This is mainly problematic in for
cases where ROC is requested for sending action frames.
To overcome this, use a time event type that has priority equal
to that ot the time event type used by the FW to action scan.
Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
The FW scheduler, schedules the bindings over a session of 128
fragments (each is 4 TU long). The quota command should allocate
all the session fragments between all the bindings that require quota
allocation. Currently, use static allocation, where the fragments
are equally distributed between all data bindings.
Note, that not allocating all the session's fragments might cause
the FW scheduler to leave the medium unused.
Signed-off-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixed-up drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/mac80211.c to change change
IEEE80211_HW_NEED_DTIM_PERIOD to IEEE80211_HW_NEED_DTIM_BEFORE_ASSOC
as requested by Johannes Berg. -- JWL
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
With new transports coming up, move to threaded
interrupt handling now. This has the advantage
that we can use the same locking scheme with all
different transports we may need to implement.
Note that the TX path obviously still runs in a
tasklet, so some spin_lock() calls need to change
to spin_lock_bh() calls to properly lock out the
TX path.
In my test on a Calpella platform this has no
impact on throughput or latency.
Also add lockdep annotations to avoid lockups due
to catch sending synchronous commands or using
locks that connect with them from the irq thread.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Express iwl_set_bit() and iwl_clear_bit() through iwl_set_bits_mask()
and add the latter to the transport's API in order to allow different
implementation for different transport types in the future.
Signed-off-by: Lilach Edelstein <lilach.edelstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
